Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.fortran > #40894
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.fortran, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? |
| Date | 2014-03-14 10:41 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lfuiro$5h9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <20140313153944.695@kylheku.com> <lfte37$p8k$1@dont-email.me> <lny50dpsqf.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <lftlb6$l5d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <7rv4i9tvf6v5vuv043s58uh391hs0e77lh@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 14/03/14 05:04, Robert Wessel wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:17:26 +0000 (UTC), glen herrmannsfeldt > <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > >> In comp.lang.c Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >>> (Incidentally, B'00000010' is not C syntax, but it's obvious >>> enough what you mean.) >> >> It is, as far as I know, OS/360 (and successor) assembler syntax. >> >> I more often use the hex constant X'123' syntax when describing >> hex constants in a language independent context. >> >> PL/I syntax for binary constants is 00000010B (binary point is >> allowed for scaled fixed binary). Leading zeros determine the >> precision (bit width) of the constant, which sometimes matters. >> >> Do newer C standards have a syntax for binary constants? > > > Nope. One would think a trivial to implement addition, breaking no > existing code, with many requests, would get at least a little > attention from the C committee... > gcc has binary literals such as 0b00100001 as an extension. Since it is in popular use, has an existing implementation, and no signs of conflicting with existing code, it is probably a good candidate for future C standards. And although it is off-topic in both C and Fortran groups, 0b001 style binary literals are due to be in C++14.
Back to comp.lang.fortran | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 12:17 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-12 09:20 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 16:30 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-18 21:48 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 19:10 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:39 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 03:41 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-18 16:45 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-18 19:14 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-18 17:36 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 07:34 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-19 12:08 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 10:07 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 17:05 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:27 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:04 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:26 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 14:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 16:48 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:35 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:26 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 13:23 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? e p chandler <epc8@juno.com> - 2014-03-12 10:05 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 16:47 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-12 18:50 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 16:16 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2014-03-12 12:49 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 21:54 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 16:57 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 22:00 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? John Harper <john.harper@vuw.ac.nz> - 2014-03-13 11:23 +1300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-12 15:36 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 23:40 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Jahns <jahns@idontlikespam.dkrz.de> - 2014-03-14 11:24 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 23:32 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 13:43 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-15 16:28 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 16:01 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-17 08:51 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:22 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Jake <thatcadguy@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 12:25 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 15:34 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2014-03-13 01:06 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? fj <francois.jacq@irsn.fr> - 2014-03-12 18:31 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-12 21:08 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@att.net> - 2014-03-13 10:54 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 19:53 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 20:16 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-13 21:57 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 03:59 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 05:02 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> - 2014-03-13 07:42 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 14:56 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 00:59 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Wolfgang Kilian <kilian@invalid.com> - 2014-03-13 09:10 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 22:36 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-13 17:54 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robert.corbett@oracle.com - 2014-03-13 23:43 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 18:07 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 04:07 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:56 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply) - 2014-03-14 09:17 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-15 11:57 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 16:38 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-15 18:09 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 19:57 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-15 19:41 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-13 22:42 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 17:13 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-13 16:46 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 01:17 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:04 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 10:41 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 09:55 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 13:16 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2014-03-18 21:08 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-18 17:41 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-20 03:55 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 21:40 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 01:02 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:36 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:30 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:51 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-14 13:12 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:29 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:47 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:52 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-03-16 17:15 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-16 16:04 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-14 08:32 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-14 23:10 -0400
csiph-web