Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.fortran > #40894

Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful?

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.fortran, comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful?
Date 2014-03-14 10:41 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <lfuiro$5h9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <20140313153944.695@kylheku.com> <lfte37$p8k$1@dont-email.me> <lny50dpsqf.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <lftlb6$l5d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <7rv4i9tvf6v5vuv043s58uh391hs0e77lh@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 14/03/14 05:04, Robert Wessel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:17:26 +0000 (UTC), glen herrmannsfeldt
> <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> 
>> In comp.lang.c Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> (Incidentally, B'00000010' is not C syntax, but it's obvious 
>>> enough what you mean.)
>>
>> It is, as far as I know, OS/360 (and successor) assembler syntax.
>>
>> I more often use the hex constant X'123' syntax when describing
>> hex constants in a language independent context. 
>>
>> PL/I syntax for binary constants is 00000010B (binary point is
>> allowed for scaled fixed binary). Leading zeros determine the
>> precision (bit width) of the constant, which sometimes matters.
>>
>> Do newer C standards have a syntax for binary constants?
> 
> 
> Nope.  One would think a trivial to implement addition, breaking no
> existing code, with many requests, would get at least a little
> attention from the C committee...
> 

gcc has binary literals such as 0b00100001 as an extension.  Since it is
in popular use, has an existing implementation, and no signs of
conflicting with existing code, it is probably a good candidate for
future C standards.

And although it is off-topic in both C and Fortran groups, 0b001 style
binary literals are due to be in C++14.

Back to comp.lang.fortran | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 11:02 -0500
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 12:17 -0400
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-12 09:20 -0700
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 16:30 -0500
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-18 21:48 +0000
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 19:10 -0500
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:39 +1100
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 03:41 -0700
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-18 16:45 -0700
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-18 19:14 -0500
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-18 17:36 -0700
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 07:34 -0400
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-19 12:08 +0000
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 10:07 -0400
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 17:05 +0100
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:27 -0500
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:04 -0500
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:26 -0500
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 14:02 -0500
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 16:48 -0300
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:35 +1100
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:26 -0500
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 13:23 -0300
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? e p chandler <epc8@juno.com> - 2014-03-12 10:05 -0700
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 16:47 +0000
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-12 18:50 +0000
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 16:16 -0300
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2014-03-12 12:49 -0700
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 21:54 +0000
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 16:57 -0500
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 22:00 +0000
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? John Harper <john.harper@vuw.ac.nz> - 2014-03-13 11:23 +1300
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-12 15:36 -0700
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 23:40 -0500
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:25 +0100
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Jahns <jahns@idontlikespam.dkrz.de> - 2014-03-14 11:24 +0100
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 23:32 -0500
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 13:43 +0000
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-15 16:28 +0100
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 16:01 +0000
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-17 08:51 +0100
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:22 +0100
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Jake <thatcadguy@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 12:25 -0700
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 15:34 -0500
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2014-03-13 01:06 +0000
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? fj <francois.jacq@irsn.fr> - 2014-03-12 18:31 -0700
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-12 21:08 -0600
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@att.net> - 2014-03-13 10:54 -0500
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 19:53 +0000
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 20:16 +0000
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-13 21:57 -0600
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 03:59 -0400
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 05:02 -0400
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> - 2014-03-13 07:42 -0600
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 14:56 +0100
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 00:59 -0700
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Wolfgang Kilian <kilian@invalid.com> - 2014-03-13 09:10 +0100
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-13 21:09 +0000
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 21:24 +0000
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 22:36 +0000
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-13 17:54 -0700
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robert.corbett@oracle.com - 2014-03-13 23:43 -0700
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 18:07 -0700
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:02 -0500
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 04:07 +0000
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:56 -0500
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply) - 2014-03-14 09:17 +0000
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-15 11:57 +0000
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 16:38 -0600
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-15 18:09 -0500
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 19:57 -0600
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-15 19:41 -0700
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-13 22:42 +0000
      Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 17:13 -0600
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-13 16:46 -0700
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 01:17 +0000
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:04 -0500
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 10:41 +0100
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 09:55 +0000
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 13:16 +0100
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2014-03-18 21:08 +0000
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-18 17:41 -0400
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-20 03:55 -0700
        Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 00:45 +0000
          Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 21:40 -0600
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 01:02 -0400
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:36 -0600
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:30 +0000
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:51 -0400
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-14 13:12 -0700
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:29 +0000
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:47 -0600
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:43 +0000
                Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:52 -0400
            Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-03-16 17:15 -0500
              Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-16 16:04 -0700
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:11 +0000
  Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-14 08:32 +1100
    Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-14 23:10 -0400

csiph-web