Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.fortran

comp.lang.fortran

113492 articles, 4745 threads (numbers 2337 – 127190) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
“The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" (507 replies — unroll, only first 100 listed — flat view) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-13 23:18 -0500
   → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-14 18:30 +0800
     → Transpiling from Pascal to Rust (was: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us") ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) 2026-10-14 11:35 +0000
     → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" "De ongekruisigde ds." <ongekruisigde-ds@invalid.invalid> 2026-10-14 11:37 +0000
       → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-14 19:59 +0800
         → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> 2026-10-14 07:35 -0700
           → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-14 11:57 -0400
         → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> 2026-10-14 13:07 -0400
           → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> 2026-10-14 14:04 -0500
             → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-14 19:34 +0000
               → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-15 05:55 +0800
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) 2026-10-14 22:11 +0000
             → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-14 20:42 -0400
               → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-14 21:43 -0500
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-15 11:22 -0400
               → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> 2026-10-15 10:40 -0500
               → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-18 09:20 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-18 10:34 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-19 06:57 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-19 15:44 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-19 20:09 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-19 16:10 -0500
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-19 18:08 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-19 17:10 -0500
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-19 18:57 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-20 05:28 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> 2026-10-20 18:46 +1300
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 13:20 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-21 01:27 +0800
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-20 18:14 +0000
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-20 14:22 -0400
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-20 18:29 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 15:06 -0500
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-20 20:20 +0000
                 → Re: The end of software secrecy is almost upon Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> 2026-11-02 10:54 +0100
                 → Re: The end of software secrecy is almost upon "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> 2026-11-02 11:11 +0100
                 → Re: The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-11-02 16:51 +0000
                 → Re: The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-11-02 20:06 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 19:32 -0400
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> 2026-10-21 03:31 +0000
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) 2026-10-21 04:31 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> 2026-10-21 10:41 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2026-10-21 14:53 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) 2026-10-21 15:57 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) 2026-10-21 16:02 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-22 00:37 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-22 11:05 +0800
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> 2026-10-21 20:07 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-22 14:22 +0800
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) 2026-10-22 04:22 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> 2026-10-21 07:37 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-10-21 12:17 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-22 00:36 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-22 09:21 +0800
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 16:40 -0400
                 → Re: The end of software secrecy is almost upon Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> 2026-11-02 10:58 +0100
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-20 19:04 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-20 19:54 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-20 20:00 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-20 23:18 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-21 01:27 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-21 03:22 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-21 05:35 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-21 20:09 +0800
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2026-10-20 23:20 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 16:49 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> 2026-10-21 01:15 +0100
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2026-10-20 20:49 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 14:36 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> 2026-10-21 16:11 +1300
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-21 05:37 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 00:48 -0500
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-20 09:39 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-20 21:51 +0800
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-20 15:50 +0000
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-20 16:41 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 16:48 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 14:48 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon us" Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-20 17:15 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-20 17:24 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2026-10-20 20:50 +0200
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2026-10-20 19:06 -0700
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-21 07:47 +0000
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-21 11:06 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-21 23:10 +0800
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-21 12:29 -0400
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-21 17:50 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> 2026-10-21 14:12 -0700
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@battlestar.co.uk 2026-10-22 14:51 +0000
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-22 12:19 -0400
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@caprica.universe 2026-10-23 08:01 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-10-23 16:15 +0800
                 → Re: Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon boltar@caprica.universe 2026-10-23 08:16 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> 2026-10-23 09:06 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-23 16:37 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> 2026-10-23 10:32 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) 2026-10-23 14:09 -0400
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> 2026-10-23 12:02 -0700
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) 2026-10-23 20:36 +0000
                 → Re: “The end of software secrecy is almost upon Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-10-23 20:28 +0000
 
The end of programming? (5 replies — unroll) ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) 2026-10-22 09:52 +0000
   → Re: The end of programming? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-10-22 14:24 +0000
     → Re: The end of programming? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-10-22 15:31 -0500
   → Re: The end of programming? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-23 03:26 +0000
     → Re: The end of programming? Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-10-24 12:25 +0000
       → Re: The end of programming? R Daneel Olivaw <desonbalon@mail.com> 2026-10-25 09:58 +0100
 
Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL (5 replies — unroll) Fred Killet <killet@killetsoft.de> 2026-10-16 08:38 +0200
   → Re: Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-16 21:46 +0000
     → Re: Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL Fred Killet <killet@killetsoft.de> 2026-10-17 05:07 +0200
   → Re: Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL Peter Parker <pparker@example.net> 2026-10-16 23:54 -0400
     → Re: Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-17 04:56 +0000
     → Re: Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL Fred Killet <killet@killetsoft.de> 2026-10-19 07:05 +0200
 
converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 (45 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-08 15:06 -0500
   → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Sam <sam@email-scan.com> 2025-04-08 20:34 -0400
     → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-09 14:48 -0500
       → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> 2025-04-10 12:11 +0300
         → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-10 14:31 -0500
   → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-04-08 23:08 -0700
     → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-09 14:50 -0500
   → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-09 07:18 +0000
     → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-09 14:48 -0500
       → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-10 00:35 +0000
         → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-10 14:39 -0500
           → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-10 19:52 +0000
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-10 15:34 -0500
               → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2025-04-11 07:28 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-11 22:08 +0000
       → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-04-11 11:37 +0200
         → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2025-04-11 16:00 +0000
           → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> 2025-04-11 12:25 -0400
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2025-04-11 16:57 +0000
           → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-11 15:44 -0500
           → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-11 15:47 -0500
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-13 17:59 -0500
               → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-13 23:10 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-14 23:50 -0500
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-15 23:14 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-15 18:28 -0500
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> 2025-04-15 23:19 -0600
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-16 13:16 -0500
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-04-16 07:44 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2025-04-16 17:24 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov> 2025-04-17 12:24 +0200
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2025-04-17 15:06 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-16 13:17 -0500
           → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-09-21 18:29 -0500
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> 2026-09-22 04:48 -0500
               → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> 2026-09-22 04:58 -0500
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-09-22 15:51 -0500
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-24 16:14 +0000
               → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-09-24 15:14 -0500
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-25 06:29 +0000
               → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-09-24 23:58 +0000
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2026-09-24 17:59 -0700
                 → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2026-09-25 14:53 +0000
             → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-09-24 16:12 -0700
   → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 davidd0002@proton.me (David Duffy) 2025-04-22 04:53 +0000
     → Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-04-22 00:14 -0500
 
RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference (5 replies — unroll) Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2026-09-14 18:37 +0800
   → Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-14 22:44 +0800
   → Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2026-09-14 18:34 +0000
     → Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-15 03:16 +0800
   → Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-14 19:49 +0000
     → Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2026-09-15 17:24 +0800
 
Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? (13 replies — unroll) "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-06 23:29 +0800
   → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-06 15:32 +0000
     → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-06 23:53 +0800
     → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-09-06 17:30 +0000
       → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-06 19:47 +0000
     → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2026-09-06 18:40 +0000
       → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-06 19:49 +0000
     → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-09-06 22:00 +0000
       → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-07 10:48 +0800
       → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> 2026-09-07 04:41 +0000
         → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-07 13:24 +0800
         → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-09-07 06:47 +0000
           → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> 2026-09-07 16:32 +0800
       → Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2026-09-07 05:08 +0000

~Page 1 of ~3745 (articles 126653–127190) Older →


csiph-web