Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... |
| Date | 2014-02-09 19:54 +0000 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <ld8mdd$cmi$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ld8hti$5mc$1@dont-email.me> <B9QJu.117219$2V.95766@en-nntp-16.dc1.easynews.com> |
On 2014-02-09, Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> wrote: > On 2014-02-09, wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is this the "right" newsgroup to "take over"? > > Since "comp.misc" is an old newsgroup which must be on every server, > and has no existing traffic, it looks like a good place to me. Since > the Slashdot crowd tends to talk about technical topics, this would > seem to fit the charter of "comp.misc", or at least whatever charter > there was at the beginning of time. > >::Still dusting of my .slrnrc file:: Also, there are other groups that would fit other traditional sections of Slashdot, but we'd risk being too spread out. For example: alt.privacy roughly corresponds to Your Rights Online, there are vintage OS groups, too many (crappy) politics groups to count, and so on. I can imagine branching some topics out to those other newsgroups, but my preference is to try to get the gang to 'assemble'in one single place until we've got something approaching critical mass.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Before we get totally entrenched here... wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 13:37 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-09 18:54 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-09 19:54 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-09 20:19 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... cykros <cykros@devio.us> - 2014-02-11 23:41 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 09:51 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... "Elizabeth T. Knuth" <eknuth@csbsju.edu> - 2014-02-11 01:09 -0600
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-11 11:27 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:34 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com - 2014-02-11 06:49 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-11 16:51 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:04 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 13:22 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... cykros <cykros@devio.us> - 2014-02-11 23:45 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:01 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... sagebump <outersend@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 09:33 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-03-03 12:05 -0600
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-03 19:49 +0000
csiph-web