Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... |
| Date | 2014-02-12 13:22 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ldgon8$na9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ld8hti$5mc$1@dont-email.me> <ldd1es$6tj$1@dont-email.me> <6qckf99bsi9854b3jntlbi7tgatk4peed1@4ax.com> <20140211165145.6cfb1df8.rsw@therandymon.com> <4248173a-b7c8-4d8e-bf2f-0800f33c5da1@googlegroups.com> |
On 2014-02-11 17:04:12 +0000, wjwlsn said: > On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:51:45 AM UTC-5, RS Wood wrote: >> It seems AIOE, Albasani.net, and Eternal-September are the biggest and >> most well-known free providers and they all offer the alt hierarchy >> (though not the binaries). Solani.net is less well known but also >> covers the alt hierarchy. I like the other suggestions though. Let's >> give it a month and then decide if it's time to move to greener >> pastures. > > I'm on board with this (wait a month and then decide). I felt the > question had to be asked, but I don't really have a strong opinion on > whether to stay in comp.misc, move to another group, or try to create a > new hierarchy. Besides, if Dice caves and ditches beta (ha!), or if > SoylentNews (or whatever the name ends up being) takes off in a big > way, a lot of people may just leave the newsgroup. I hope people stick > around though, because I really like the idea of having this kind of > discussion group being independent from any single owner. While I doubt Dice will cave, and I also doubt that SoylentNews (or whatever) will gather enough steam to really draw people from Usenet, I don't intend to go (back) to either one. Proprietary web forums have had their day, in my opinion, and I have seen enough of them ruined by over-zealous dictators, spam, marketing and political shillery, censorship in the name of and so forth, that I'd just rather stick to the original prototypical forum, Usenet. It's also a philosophical stand - I don't think that I want to be contributing to the internet ad economy any more, and ultimately this is what most forums run on. I sat in on an IRC chat on #altslashdot for a while, and it was clear that the goals they have in mind would engender the same kinds of problems that Slashdot (among other forums) has right now.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Before we get totally entrenched here... wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 13:37 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-09 18:54 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-09 19:54 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-09 20:19 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... cykros <cykros@devio.us> - 2014-02-11 23:41 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 09:51 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... "Elizabeth T. Knuth" <eknuth@csbsju.edu> - 2014-02-11 01:09 -0600
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-11 11:27 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:34 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com - 2014-02-11 06:49 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-11 16:51 +0000
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:04 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 13:22 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... cykros <cykros@devio.us> - 2014-02-11 23:45 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:01 -0500
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... sagebump <outersend@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 09:33 -0800
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-03-03 12:05 -0600
Re: Before we get totally entrenched here... RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-03 19:49 +0000
csiph-web