Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #26912

Re: Making Forth official

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/22/2013 6:00 AM, Mark wrote:
> "Albert van der Horst" wrote in message
> news:528eba79$0$1684$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl...
>>
>> In article <XsidnXzxrpJSsxPPnZ2dnUVZ8m-dnZ2d@bt.com>,
>> Mark <mark@dibsco.co.uk> wrote:
>>> "Paul E Bennett" wrote in message
>>> news:bf6oboFld0gU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> As one who uses the .fth extension for Forth Source files and
>>>> usually the
>>>> Kwrite Editor on a linux System, I would vote for the .fth etension
>>>> to be
>>>> included.
>>>>
>>>> Kwrite actually manages to do some interesting highlighting with the
>>>> source
>>>> code without having to be told about it. None of the highlighting
>>>> effects
>>>> affect the source code delivered to VfXForth.
>>>
>>> I guess that if you have a reasonably new version of Kwrite (post
>>> December
>>> 2011) then this might be my syntax highlighter. I asked on CLF for
>>> commonly
>>> used file extensions and ended up including .4th, .f, .frt, .fs, .fth
>>> and
>>> .seq.
>>
>> Interesting! How did you pull that off, where .f seems to be taken by
>> FORTRAN?
>
> The syntax highlighting system for Kwrite/Kate/KDevelop allows
> highlighting files to reference the same file extensions. Conflicts are
> resolved using a priority level (See my reply to C G Montgomery).

I can't see the value in that.   Or are source types loaded individually 
so that you might have Forth installed, but not Fortran, but when you 
load Fortran it would then take over the .f extension?

If all source types loaded there can be only one winner for any given 
extension and all the others are disabled, no?

-- 

Rick

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-21 13:23 +0000
  Re: Making Forth official Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-11-21 14:54 +0100
    Re: Making Forth official gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-12-03 11:59 -0800
  Re: Making Forth official anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-11-21 13:57 +0000
    Re: Making Forth official Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 15:49 +0000
      Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 16:03 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 23:27 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official C G Montgomery <cgm@physics.utoledo.edu> - 2013-11-21 19:20 -0500
          Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 10:43 +0000
            Re: Making Forth official Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-11-22 17:24 +0100
              Re: Making Forth official Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 14:11 +0100
        Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-22 01:59 +0000
          Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 11:00 +0000
            Re: Making Forth official rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-11-22 12:05 -0500
              Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 21:15 +0000
    Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-22 01:55 +0000
  Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-21 15:50 +0000
    Re: Making Forth official Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-11-22 00:03 +0100
    Re: Making Forth official Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-11-22 08:19 +0100
      Re: Making Forth official m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-11-21 23:42 -0800
        Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-23 17:22 +0000
          Re: Making Forth official Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 14:07 +0100
      Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 11:30 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-11-22 11:35 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-11-23 19:11 +1100
          Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-23 12:46 +0000
            Re: Making Forth official "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-11-27 12:42 +1100
              Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-27 03:35 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-11-23 17:31 +0000
          Re: Making Forth official "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2013-11-24 04:35 -0500
  Re: Making Forth official ForthFreak <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-11-21 23:53 -0800
  Re: Making Forth official "Mark" <mark@dibsco.co.uk> - 2013-12-31 16:48 +0000
    Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-12-31 22:49 +0000
      Re: Making Forth official Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-31 15:10 -0800
        Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-01 14:12 +0000
          Re: Making Forth official anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-01-02 17:46 +0000
            Re: Making Forth official Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-02 13:03 -0800
              Re: Making Forth official "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-02 20:16 -0500
              Re: Making Forth official Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 01:24 -0800
            Re: Making Forth official "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-02 20:13 -0500
      Re: Making Forth official anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-01-02 17:33 +0000
        Re: Making Forth official albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-02 19:22 +0000

csiph-web