Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274508
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) |
| Date | 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kqtcbc-0ur.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <jOOdncHoneSi637InZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8oecbc-fcq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xu-dnQpgjM8QMn7InZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <73pcbc-qfr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d4WdnZqfsqhgX37InZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:73pcbc-qfr.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:8oecbc-fcq.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> ... >>>>>> If nukes were used, the background radiation would STILL be higher >>>>>> than normal, and it is not, kook. >>>>> >>>>> And yet you have never considered the places that used M291 resin to >>>>> soak >>>>> up >>>>> radioactivity. >>>> >>>> You can not soak radioactivity out of something. >>> >>> Ok, so it was used to stop radiation from spreading. >>> >>> Still you don't consider the places where M291 resin was deployed or why >>> both Chernobyl and the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" that was really the >>> location of a nuclear detonation were both covered/filled with concrete. >> >> You are attempting to change the subject. >> >> If nukes were used, the background radiation in the whole area would >> STILL be higher than normal, and it is not, kook. > > You are thinking of dirty nukes and not clean nukes. And who says all nukes > have to be dirty? Is it the same people that nuked the Twin Towers? Basic physics says ALL nukes result in a LOT radiation, fruitcake. <snip remaining delusional raving> If you get help you may be able to hold a job, nutcase. -- Jim Pennino
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:05 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:42 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:38 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:35 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:34 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:25 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:37 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:37 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:58 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:33 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:04 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:35 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:00 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:58 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:28 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:34 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:23 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:01 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 02:37 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:00 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:27 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:36 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:59 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:42 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 07:27 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (FNN is using outright lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:45 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 07:23 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:37 -0500
csiph-web