Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274537
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) |
| Date | 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ms14o7$u5o$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <e5Wdnbysq42z9H7InZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <bc7cbc-ump.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <jOOdncHoneSi637InZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8oecbc-fcq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <xu-dnQpgjM8QMn7InZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 31/08/2015 02:35, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8oecbc-fcq.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > ... >>>> If nukes were used, the background radiation would STILL be higher >>>> than normal, and it is not, kook. >>> >>> And yet you have never considered the places that used M291 resin to soak >>> up >>> radioactivity. >> >> You can not soak radioactivity out of something. > > Ok, so it was used to stop radiation from spreading. > > Still you don't consider the places where M291 resin was deployed or why > both Chernobyl and the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" that was really the > location of a nuclear detonation were both covered/filled with concrete. > > >>> And what if the radiation left behind is like Fukishima's radiation where >>> it >>> takes a special Geiger counter to detect it? >> What radiation would that be? What type of Geiger counter would that be? >> That is jus babbling nonsense. > > Then you explain why the radiation from Fukishima is different than the > radiation from Hanford. > > >>> Still the preponderance of the evidence proves that underground nukes >>> left >>> the corners of the Twin Towers standing strong and made liars out of >>> NIST, >>> NORAD, FAA, EPA, NNSA and above all the USGS. <G> >> >> That is just delusional paranoia. > > And yet you or NIST have been unable to explain how two 110 story buildings > can fall down and then leave large parts of the lower floors intact like the > outside walls or Stairwell B in the North Tower where over a dozen people > survived. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Or see: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ > > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:05 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:42 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:38 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:35 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:34 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:25 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:37 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:37 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:58 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:33 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:04 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:35 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:00 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:58 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:28 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:34 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:23 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:01 +0000
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 02:37 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:00 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:27 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:36 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:59 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:42 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 07:27 +0200
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (FNN is using outright lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:45 -0500
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 07:23 -0700
Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:37 -0500
csiph-web