Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24557
| From | Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Package naming, disk organization |
| Date | 2013-07-01 17:39 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kqssv3$dfm$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
I'm having fun with Java (really!), but the real-world use of packages is driving me crazy. If I were a corp. with a web site I might have a something like this: org.davesjava.firstlgproj for a package specification. I guess the disk drive files would be something like: home/org/davesjava/firstlgproj (I use Linux, so there are no '\'). However: * I don't have a commercial organization (yet), so I would need something else - but what? Would jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj be ok? It seems to work for one trial, but down the road... * I read that Java programmers like to have a source path and a class path on the hard drive, which makes sense. So how does that work for package specifications? Would it be: src/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj and class/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj ? Assuming so, would a package specification of jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj still be ok? * There is a conflict between a simple file structure and a conventional package specification. For example, I may like: home/jsoft/src/firstlgproj and home/jsoft/class/firstljproj , but that translates into jsoft.class.firstlgproj - not exactly to convention. So, I'm looking for some suggestions from people that have been there done that. Thanks, Dave
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-01 17:39 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 15:22 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-01 23:56 +0000
Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:35 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 17:22 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-02 18:51 +0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-07-18 23:50 -0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-01 21:30 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-02 11:09 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-03 22:53 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-03 20:35 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-04 12:34 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:08 +0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-04 18:24 +0100
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 11:26 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:42 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:40 +0000
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 14:01 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:06 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:39 -0400
csiph-web