Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24624

Re: Package naming, disk organization

Date 2013-07-04 15:39 -0400
From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Package naming, disk organization
References <kqssv3$dfm$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kquqfj$38p$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Message-ID <51d5cf60$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink)
Organization SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/2/2013 11:09 AM, Dave wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 05:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>> I'm having fun with Java (really!), but the real-world use of packages
>> is driving me crazy.  If I were a corp. with a web site I might have a
>> something like this: org.davesjava.firstlgproj for a package
>> specification. I guess the disk drive files would be something like:
>> home/org/davesjava/firstlgproj (I use Linux, so there are no '\').
>>
>> However:
>> * I don't have a commercial organization (yet), so I would need
>> something else - but what?  Would jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj be ok?  It
>> seems to work for one trial, but down the road...
>>
>> * I read that Java programmers like to have a source path and a class
>> path on the hard drive, which makes sense.  So how does that work for
>> package specifications?  Would it be: src/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj
>> and class/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj ?  Assuming so, would a package
>> specification of jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj still be ok?
>>
>> * There is a conflict between a simple file structure and a conventional
>> package specification.  For example, I may like:
>> home/jsoft/src/firstlgproj and home/jsoft/class/firstljproj , but that
>> translates into jsoft.class.firstlgproj - not exactly to convention.
>>
>> So, I'm looking for some suggestions from people that have been there
>> done that.

> Fist, thanks for all of the insight!  Based on what everyone has said,
> and what I have read (Oracle, other online info), the plan is to:
>
> 1. Eventually get URL, but that will have to wait until a few other
> shoes have dropped so I don't have to keep changing it (as was mentioned
> by a few of you).  Something I did not consider, but with the wave of
> mergers of companies, I can see that this could be a real headache to
> down-stream developers using my packages.
>
> 2. For now, use foo.dboland.<proj_name> as the URL.

I will say as many other - why not do it right from start
and follow the domain convention.

>                                                      The disk
> organization would then be (Linux):
>      home/user/javadev/src/foo/dboland/<proj_name>
>      home/user/javadev/class/foo/dboland/<proj_name>
> The class path will be: home/user/javadev/class
> And the package specification will be: foo.dboland.<proj_name>

You will find that:

home/user/javadev/<proj_name>/src/foo/dboland/<proj_name>
home/user/javadev/<proj_name>/bin/foo/dboland/<proj_name>

work better with both the common IDE's and some command
line tools.

Arne



Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-01 17:39 -0400
  Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 15:22 -0700
    Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-01 23:56 +0000
  Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:35 -0700
  Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:36 -0700
  Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 17:22 -0700
    Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-02 18:51 +0300
    Re: Package naming, disk organization Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-07-18 23:50 -0300
  Re: Package naming, disk organization Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-01 21:30 -0400
    Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 18:43 -0700
  Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-02 11:09 -0400
    Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-03 22:53 -0400
    Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-03 20:35 -0700
      Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-04 12:34 -0400
        Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:08 +0300
        Re: Package naming, disk organization lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-04 18:24 +0100
        Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 11:26 -0700
        Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:42 -0400
        Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:40 +0000
          Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 14:01 -0700
          Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:06 -0400
    Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:39 -0400

csiph-web