Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24624
| Date | 2013-07-04 15:39 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Package naming, disk organization |
| References | <kqssv3$dfm$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kquqfj$38p$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <51d5cf60$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 7/2/2013 11:09 AM, Dave wrote: > On 07/01/2013 05:39 PM, Dave wrote: >> I'm having fun with Java (really!), but the real-world use of packages >> is driving me crazy. If I were a corp. with a web site I might have a >> something like this: org.davesjava.firstlgproj for a package >> specification. I guess the disk drive files would be something like: >> home/org/davesjava/firstlgproj (I use Linux, so there are no '\'). >> >> However: >> * I don't have a commercial organization (yet), so I would need >> something else - but what? Would jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj be ok? It >> seems to work for one trial, but down the road... >> >> * I read that Java programmers like to have a source path and a class >> path on the hard drive, which makes sense. So how does that work for >> package specifications? Would it be: src/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj >> and class/jsoft/davesjava/firstlgproj ? Assuming so, would a package >> specification of jsoft.davesjava.firstlgproj still be ok? >> >> * There is a conflict between a simple file structure and a conventional >> package specification. For example, I may like: >> home/jsoft/src/firstlgproj and home/jsoft/class/firstljproj , but that >> translates into jsoft.class.firstlgproj - not exactly to convention. >> >> So, I'm looking for some suggestions from people that have been there >> done that. > Fist, thanks for all of the insight! Based on what everyone has said, > and what I have read (Oracle, other online info), the plan is to: > > 1. Eventually get URL, but that will have to wait until a few other > shoes have dropped so I don't have to keep changing it (as was mentioned > by a few of you). Something I did not consider, but with the wave of > mergers of companies, I can see that this could be a real headache to > down-stream developers using my packages. > > 2. For now, use foo.dboland.<proj_name> as the URL. I will say as many other - why not do it right from start and follow the domain convention. > The disk > organization would then be (Linux): > home/user/javadev/src/foo/dboland/<proj_name> > home/user/javadev/class/foo/dboland/<proj_name> > The class path will be: home/user/javadev/class > And the package specification will be: foo.dboland.<proj_name> You will find that: home/user/javadev/<proj_name>/src/foo/dboland/<proj_name> home/user/javadev/<proj_name>/bin/foo/dboland/<proj_name> work better with both the common IDE's and some command line tools. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-01 17:39 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 15:22 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-01 23:56 +0000
Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:35 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-07-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-01 17:22 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-02 18:51 +0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-07-18 23:50 -0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-01 21:30 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-02 11:09 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-03 22:53 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-07-03 20:35 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Dave <dboland9@fastmail.fm> - 2013-07-04 12:34 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:08 +0300
Re: Package naming, disk organization lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-04 18:24 +0100
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 11:26 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:42 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-07-04 20:40 +0000
Re: Package naming, disk organization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-04 14:01 -0700
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:06 -0400
Re: Package naming, disk organization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 15:39 -0400
csiph-web