Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617008

Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4

From whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4
Date 2023-08-07 12:20 -0500
Message-ID <kjcnfaF6lukU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <2216b7d1-2fc4-431b-8674-8cec0a66fdden@googlegroups.com> <a923b88a-a714-4987-a7e8-b2a360269ed8n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/7/2023 12:14 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
>>
>> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
>>
>> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>>
>> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum

>> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

> Those relativists here who want to fob this off as crank junk are ignorant about the matter.

Sure thing, your idols are better than anything!

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-07 02:37 -0700
  Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:48 +0200
    Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 03:00 -0700
      Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Henry Marlovetsky <ylsm@vyytrlay.em> - 2023-08-07 11:23 +0000
    Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-07 05:55 -0700
  Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 04:38 -0700
    Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:16 -0700
      Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-07 12:31 -0500
  Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:14 -0700
    Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-07 12:20 -0500
  Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-07 10:28 -0700
  Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 13:41 -0700
    Re: Theoretical Physicists Reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 21:13 -0700

csiph-web