Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #19543
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Loop structures |
| Date | 2013-02-08 03:46 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kf2dtm$imu$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <lridnZcasu89tY_MnZ2dnUVZ8lqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <50e33034-7e5b-47e7-8c65-b3ab71669044@z9g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> |
"Hugh Aguilar" <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:50e33034-7e5b-47e7-8c65-b3ab71669044@z9g2000vbx.googlegroups.com... > I had FOR NEXT in MFX, as well as DO. I don't think I > will support either this time. I will have TIMES, which > is a simplified version of FOR NEXT that always counts > down to 0 rather than going either up or down and going > to an arbitrary limit. That just allocated one more register ... another one for zero ... three for top of stack items ... two for stack pointers ... You're going to run out of registers on 64-bit x86! ;-) Do you plan a compatibility package with definitions for, say DO, FOR, NEXT, etc, in terms of TIMES? Do you see any contradiction in you providing numerous stacks: float, integer, loop, control etc., i.e., "generous" or "liberal", but at the same you're limiting the language to the minimum, i.e., "constrained" or "conservative". Lol, RP
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loop structures kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2013-02-06 03:55 -0600
Re: Loop structures Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-06 04:24 -0600
Re: Loop structures Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 05:38 -0800
Re: Loop structures Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-06 10:43 -0800
Re: Loop structures "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2013-02-08 03:46 -0500
Re: Loop structures awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-02-06 20:19 +0100
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-07 20:27 +1100
Re: Loop structures Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-02-07 17:03 +0100
Re: Loop structures awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-02-08 00:43 +0100
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-09 20:52 +1100
Re: Loop structures Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-09 18:05 -0600
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-10 11:48 +1100
Re: Loop structures awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-02-11 01:41 +0100
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-11 12:56 +1100
Re: Loop structures "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-10 17:54 -1000
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-12 15:11 +1100
Re: Loop structures Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-13 09:49 -0600
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:32 -0800
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-13 12:34 +1100
Re: Loop structures "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-12 15:49 -1000
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-13 14:48 +1100
Re: Loop structures Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-12 23:02 -0800
Re: Loop structures Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-12 23:29 -0800
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-13 13:35 +0000
Re: Loop structures Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-13 15:17 +0100
Re: Loop structures Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-13 09:01 -0800
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-13 20:22 +0000
Re: Loop structures anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-14 18:41 +0000
Re: Loop structures Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-14 21:44 +0100
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-14 21:06 +0000
Re: Loop structures Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-14 23:51 +0100
Re: Loop structures mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-02-15 00:56 +0200
Re: Loop structures anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-15 09:53 +0000
Re: Loop structures m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-02-15 03:36 -0800
Re: Loop structures anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-15 09:44 +0000
Re: Loop structures Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-03-04 13:04 +0100
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-04 13:22 +0000
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-15 13:09 +1100
Re: Loop structures Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-14 19:21 -0800
Re: Loop structures albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-15 13:01 +0000
Re: Loop structures Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-15 07:51 -0800
Re: Loop structures Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 10:51 -0800
Re: Loop structures "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-15 13:11 +1100
Re: Loop structures "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-14 21:31 -1000
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 00:18 -0800
Re: Loop structures alberto@hal-pc.org - 2013-02-13 14:27 +0000
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 07:08 -0800
Re: Loop structures m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-02-13 08:23 -0800
Re: Loop structures stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-02-13 17:32 +0000
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 23:17 -0800
Re: Loop structures stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-02-14 10:53 +0000
Re: Loop structures stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-02-14 13:42 +0000
Re: Loop structures "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 21:25 -0800
Re: Loop structures "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 21:18 -0800
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 23:15 -0800
Re: Loop structures mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-02-14 22:08 +0200
Re: Loop structures Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 22:53 -0800
Re: Loop structures awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-02-12 16:00 +0100
Re: Loop structures kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2013-02-13 03:49 -0600
csiph-web