Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html > #3207

Re: HTML5 NG?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

dorayme wrote:
> In article <k7ui6f$k58$1@dont-email.me>,
>  "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> 
>> There's a lot of room in this group for discussing all aspects of HTML 
>> authoring for the WWW. There is no point in creating new groups when the 
>> old groups are dying.
> 
> Well said.
> 

Have you considered Thomas' valid points about the HTML5 DOM API?  In a
strict sense these topics might be neither on topic in c.i.w.a.html nor
in c.l.js.

Follow up to c.l.js (at least I tried to)

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

Back to comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

HTML5 NG? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-11-13 14:25 -0800
  Re: HTML5 NG? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-11-14 00:39 +0200
    Re: HTML5 NG? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-11-14 11:03 +1100
      Re: HTML5 NG? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-11-14 02:21 +0100
        Re: HTML5 NG? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-11-14 09:36 +0200
          Re: HTML5 NG? Andreas Prilop <prilop4321@trashmail.net> - 2012-11-14 20:08 +0100
            Re: HTML5 NG? David Stone <no.email@domain.invalid> - 2012-11-14 15:42 -0500
  Yes: c.i.w.a.h. (was: HTML5 NG?) tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2012-11-13 19:24 -0500
  Re: HTML5 NG? "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2012-11-13 19:26 -0800

csiph-web