Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html > #3204

Re: HTML5 NG?

From "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Newsgroups comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
Subject Re: HTML5 NG?
Date 2012-11-14 00:39 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k7ui6f$k58$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <c8ec2584-c5ff-4588-80af-0ff853c6af09@h16g2000vby.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


2012-11-14 0:25, justaguy wrote:

> Do you have such a NG?

What?

Please learn the basics of Usenet conduct before suggesting the creation 
of new groups. It is bad practice to imply the Subject line in content.

> It would seem beneficial to have one dedicated to HTML5.

No it would not, and your past babbling about this in an off-topic group 
(c.l.javascript) suggests that you have no idea of how Usenet works.

There's a lot of room in this group for discussing all aspects of HTML 
authoring for the WWW. There is no point in creating new groups when the 
old groups are dying.

-- 
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Back to comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

HTML5 NG? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-11-13 14:25 -0800
  Re: HTML5 NG? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-11-14 00:39 +0200
    Re: HTML5 NG? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-11-14 11:03 +1100
      Re: HTML5 NG? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2012-11-14 02:21 +0100
        Re: HTML5 NG? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-11-14 09:36 +0200
          Re: HTML5 NG? Andreas Prilop <prilop4321@trashmail.net> - 2012-11-14 20:08 +0100
            Re: HTML5 NG? David Stone <no.email@domain.invalid> - 2012-11-14 15:42 -0500
  Yes: c.i.w.a.h. (was: HTML5 NG?) tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2012-11-13 19:24 -0500
  Re: HTML5 NG? "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2012-11-13 19:26 -0800

csiph-web