Re: Article

From	"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Article
Date	2012-09-05 02:40 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<k26s0c$qdd$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <f847d585-a15f-492b-9e79-fa8dba0e36f3@googlegroups.com> <k23a3t$j03$1@speranza.aioe.org> <h-udndIS47mJrNjNnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@supernews.com> <k24f3e$4ev$1@speranza.aioe.org> <QvCdnYAbyKcgsNvNnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Andrew Haley" <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote in message
news:QvCdnYAbyKcgsNvNnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@supernews.com...
> Rod Pemberton <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> wrote:
> > "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> wrote in message
> > news:h-udndIS47mJrNjNnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@supernews.com...
> >> On 9/3/12 12:17 PM, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > He rants about symtab, Testra, driving a Taxi, and Ms. Rather.  You
> >> > rant about Lua, Lisp, and all sorts of crap.  Technically, he
> >> > qualifies as a "kook" and you as a "troll".
> >>
> >> John made an innocuous remark about his partner several years ago,
> >> [...]
> >
> > I pointed out John was "female" in his responses a while back.  It's
> > _obvious_ to heterosexual males, or at least it is to me.
> >
> >> [...] Hugh is also very profoundly homophobic.
> >
> > <OT: Homophobia and LGBT issues.>
> >
> > Most men are.  If that's the norm, why is it a negative?
>
> It's not.
...

> Homophobia is probably associated with homosexual arousal: see
> https://my.psychologytoday.com/files/u47/Henry_et_al.pdf
>

I'll ignore the fact that that's usually the argument which _homosexuals_
use to antagonize, anger, and suppress the views of people with normal
testosterone levels in order to further their agenda.

What's great about the Internet is that I can easily find garbage psychology
articles as quickly as you.

This one says homophobia is *purely* genetic:
http://genepi.qimr.edu.au/contents/p/staff/VerweijPaperBehGen.pdf

Would gays and lesbians like it if non-LGBT individuals use the "we're born
this way" genetic argument to legitimately justify homophobia?  No, they
wouldn't.  But, there it is...

According to this study, gays are homophobic.  They are internally
homophobic.  The more homophobic they are, the more they drink, and the more
homophobic they become:
http://drnicely.com/downloads/Dissertation.pdf

Now, I don't know if "internally homophobic" means "self-hate" or means
"homophobic" towards others, but it doesn't really matter does it?
Homosexuals are homophobic according to that psychological study.

You've gotta love garbage psychology!

Go ahead and ask someone gay if they are homophobic in *any way*.  I'm sure
they'll tell you absolutely not!  That seems totally stupid doesn't it?  To
non-homosexuals, the argument you presented that straight people fear
homosexuals because homesexuality arouses them is equally stupid.

But...
If that article is true, it could lead to *all* sorts of conundrums.  If
they found that gays are homophobic, whose to say gays don't also
overcompensate in an attempt to hide their homosexuality, become intensely
homophobic themselves towards others, and then commit hate crimes against
other gays?  What if normal people are being falsely blamed for acts of hate
by gays pretending to be straight ... ?  We've seen Jews paint racist
remarks and claim racism.  We've seen blacks paint racist remarks themselves
and claim racism.  How do we know some gays and lesbians aren't painting
homophobic remarks and claiming hate crimes?

> > This country is about majority rule, not non-discrimination.
>
> This country?  Which country is this?
>

I mentioned USA...

Rod Pemberton

Thread

Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-29 23:00 -0700
  Re: Article Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 01:47 -0700
    Re: Article anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-30 12:13 +0000
  Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-30 11:31 -0400
    Missing from USENET - was [Re: Article] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-08-30 10:37 -0500
      Missing from USENET - was [Re: Article] Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 10:30 -0700
  Re: Article hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2012-08-30 19:56 -0700
    Re: Article awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2012-08-31 12:35 +0200
  Re: Article "Greg Bailey" <greg@greenarraychips.com> - 2012-08-31 17:51 -0700
    Re: Article Whammo <sidciavic@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 18:22 -0700
    Re: Article Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 01:04 -0700
      Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-02 16:18 -0700
    Re: Article Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-09-01 01:48 -0700
    Re: Article rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 18:38 -0400
    Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-02 16:59 -0700
    Re: Article Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-09-03 13:07 -0500
      Re: Article Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-09-03 14:25 -0700
      Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-04 17:04 -0700
        Re: Article Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 06:23 +0300
    Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-03 18:17 -0400
      Re: Article "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-03 12:37 -1000
        Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-04 04:48 -0400
          Re: Article Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-09-04 03:39 -0700
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 02:48 -0400
          Re: Article awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2012-09-04 13:18 +0200
            Re: Article Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-04 16:03 +0200
              Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 03:29 -0400
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 03:24 -0400
          Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-04 08:12 -0700
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 16:06 -0400
          Re: Article Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-09-04 11:35 -0500
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 02:40 -0400
              Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-05 13:28 -0700
          Re: Article "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-04 08:32 -1000
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 02:22 -0400
              Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 10:08 -0700
                Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 16:07 -0400
                Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 13:39 -0700
              Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-05 13:35 -0700
            Re: Article "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-07 17:24 +1000
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-07 05:28 -0400
              Re: Article Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 03:28 -0700
              Re: Article Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2012-09-07 13:31 +0300
                Re: Article jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-09-07 06:33 -0700
                Re: Article Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 09:06 -0700
              Re: Article Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-07 09:03 -0700
        Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-04 16:45 -0700
      Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 21:38 -0700
        Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 02:51 -0400
          Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 10:49 -0700
            Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 16:20 -0400
        Re: Article "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-09-05 16:06 -0400
          Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 13:32 -0700
            Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-05 13:50 -0700
              Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-05 22:34 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-07 14:05 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-08 01:53 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-07 18:22 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 00:08 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-08 17:34 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 15:57 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-09 08:12 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 22:07 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-09 15:14 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-10 01:52 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-09 19:17 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-10 15:01 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-10 07:00 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-11 01:07 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-10 18:47 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-10 16:08 -1000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-11 07:51 +0000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-11 19:24 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-11 21:40 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-09 14:58 -1000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-09 18:24 -0700
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-09-09 13:42 +0000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 10:34 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-08 07:06 -0400
                Re: Forth as a polarising language mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 16:14 +0200
                DEFER (was: Forth as a polarising language) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-08 16:47 +0000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-09 04:22 -0400
                OOP (was: Forth as a polarising language) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-08 11:38 +0000
                Re: OOP Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-08 08:19 -0400
                Re: OOP mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 16:41 +0200
                Re: OOP Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-09 04:24 -0400
                Re: Forth as a polarising language mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-09 12:03 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-09-09 13:20 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 08:33 -0400
                Re: OOP mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 16:54 +0200
                Re: OOP Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-09 04:12 -0400
                OOP (was: Forth as a polarising language) mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 16:28 +0200
                Re: OOP (was: Forth as a polarising language) mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-08 16:56 +0200
                Re: OOP (was: Forth as a polarising language) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-08 15:00 +0000
                Re: OOP (was: Forth as a polarising language) Roger Ivie <rivie@ridgenet.net> - 2012-09-08 11:56 -0500
                Re: OOP Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-09 04:20 -0400
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 00:15 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 00:50 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-09-09 03:12 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-09 16:01 +0200
                Re: Forth as a polarising language "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-09 14:54 -1000
                [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-09-10 06:33 -0500
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 08:16 -0400
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 08:28 -0400
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-09-10 12:43 +0000
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 09:24 -0400
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-09-10 08:12 -0500
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 09:32 -0400
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-10 07:40 -1000
                Re: [OT] Newsreader problem - was [Re: Forth as a polarising language] Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2012-09-10 14:42 -0500
                Re: Forth as a polarising language Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 07:59 -0400
                Re: Forth as a polarising language rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 12:27 -0400
                Re: Forth as a polarising language "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-09-10 07:44 -1000
                Re: Forth as a polarising language rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-09-10 12:30 -0400
            Re: Article "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-09 14:13 +1000
              Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-11 11:26 -0700
                Re: Article "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-09-11 21:02 +0100
                Re: Article vandys@vsta.org - 2012-09-11 20:37 +0000
                Re: Article "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-12 20:01 +1000
              Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-11 16:50 -0700
                Re: Article Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 00:45 -0700
                Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-12 18:44 -0700
                Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-12 20:26 -0700
                Re: Article "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-12 20:47 +1000
    Re: Article Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-06 19:28 -0700
      Re: Article John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-09-07 09:57 -0700

csiph-web