Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output |
| Date | 2012-06-25 09:42 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <js9prv$20f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <js092m$pov$1@dont-email.me> <lnipek8bri.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <js1gf5$l7v$1@dont-email.me> <0.06d3eacd14619c86d384.20120622143458BST.87ehp7o4fx.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <aa9350d4-e997-4535-afbd-9ae0daa01811@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/25/2012 3:27 AM, nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com wrote:
>[...]
> I've seen program behaviour change due to UB when a compiler was upgraded (same manufacturer). Changing optimisation can do it too.
Even an "unrelated" change to the program can expose UB in
an unchanged section. See also "Heisenbug."
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Yogesh Yadav Pacheria <yogeshpacheria@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 12:56 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2012-06-21 13:08 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 16:52 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-06-21 20:11 +0000
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-06-21 21:29 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-21 22:08 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 00:00 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-21 16:51 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 11:09 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-22 05:36 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-22 14:34 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-22 12:45 -0500
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-25 14:32 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-25 09:42 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-06-25 11:33 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-07-04 16:27 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-04 17:46 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-07-05 09:08 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-06 17:34 +0200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-22 12:31 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-22 16:21 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 21:06 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-06-22 13:30 +0200
Re: BartC (was: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output) "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 13:06 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-22 09:26 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-01 16:33 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-01 17:15 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-01 18:45 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-01 13:03 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-02 00:18 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-24 23:45 +0300
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-24 09:15 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-24 23:54 +0300
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-24 15:12 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-25 13:53 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-21 15:17 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Yogesh Yadav Pacheria <yogeshpacheria@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 21:03 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-22 00:06 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-06-22 08:30 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 09:18 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-22 12:36 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-06-22 14:25 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-06-22 10:27 +0200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-06-22 13:46 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2012-07-13 02:09 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-22 23:11 +1200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-06-22 12:18 +0100
csiph-web