Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output |
| Date | 2012-06-22 00:00 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <js092m$pov$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <8404c4f1-a3b7-46b7-ad9c-17de265f9aee@googlegroups.com> <js02hp$jsl$1@dont-email.me> <js03uf$sb3$1@dont-email.me> |
"Eric Sosman" <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> wrote in message
news:js03uf$sb3$1@dont-email.me...
> On 6/21/2012 5:08 PM, BartC wrote:
>> "Yogesh Yadav Pacheria" <yogeshpacheria@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8404c4f1-a3b7-46b7-ad9c-17de265f9aee@googlegroups.com...
>>> int i = 0;
>>> i = ++i + ++i + ++i;
>>> printf("%d",i);
>>> Output should be 6
>>>
>>> But In GCC it's 7
>> I agree it ought to be 6.
>
> Nitwit.
Yet, given the OP's program, and a randomly assigned but unknown compiler,
what result would you put your money on, if you were obliged to gamble?
And once you know the result, would you gamble on the same compiler giving
the exactly the same answer one more time?
--
Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Yogesh Yadav Pacheria <yogeshpacheria@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 12:56 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2012-06-21 13:08 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 16:52 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-06-21 20:11 +0000
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-06-21 21:29 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-21 22:08 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 00:00 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-21 16:51 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 11:09 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-22 05:36 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-22 14:34 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-06-22 12:45 -0500
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-25 14:32 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-25 09:42 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-06-25 11:33 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-07-04 16:27 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-04 17:46 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-07-05 09:08 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-06 17:34 +0200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-22 12:31 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-22 16:21 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-21 21:06 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-06-22 13:30 +0200
Re: BartC (was: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output) "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-22 13:06 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-22 09:26 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-01 16:33 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-01 17:15 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-01 18:45 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-01 13:03 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-02 00:18 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-24 23:45 +0300
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-24 09:15 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-24 23:54 +0300
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-24 15:12 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-06-25 13:53 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-21 15:17 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Yogesh Yadav Pacheria <yogeshpacheria@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 21:03 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-22 00:06 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-06-22 08:30 +0100
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 09:18 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-22 12:36 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-06-22 14:25 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-06-22 10:27 +0200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-06-22 13:46 -0400
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2012-07-13 02:09 -0700
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-22 23:11 +1200
Re: Pre And Post Increment Operator Output Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-06-22 12:18 +0100
csiph-web