Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #17708

Re: strncpy and 'n'

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: strncpy and 'n'
Date 2012-02-20 17:51 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jhuipv$ffg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <58d7c42a-7fd9-4507-bbe6-88941700b88a@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <lnvcn6fyi2.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <jhrkl9$g1h$1@reader1.panix.com> <lnboouef7m.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <jhudnl$gkf$1@reader1.panix.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/20/2012 04:25 PM, Joe keane wrote:
...
> Why can i use the same format for float/double in 'fprintf', but not in
> 'fscanf'?

Because float gets promoted to double when passed to fprintf(), while
the concept of "promoted type" doesn't even apply to the pointer
arguments passed to fscanf(). float* and double* are incompatible types,
which means they must be treated differently, and fscanf() needs to know
about that face.

> Why is it that multiply long and long gives long, but short and short
> gives int?

Integer types that are smaller than 'int' get promoted to 'int' on the
principle that 'int' should be the natural integer type for a given
platform. Integer types smaller than 'int' should be used only when
needed to save space - types larger than 'int' should be used only when
needed to represent large numbers.

...
> Why is it that 'int' means signed, but 'char' can be either one?

Because the normal character type on many of the machines that C was
first ported to was signed, while on many others it was unsigned,
whereas the normal integer type was (almost?) always signed.
-- 
James Kuyper

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

strncpy and 'n' nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 09:05 -0800
  Re: strncpy and 'n' Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-02-16 18:57 +0100
    Re: strncpy and 'n' "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-02-16 19:27 +0100
      Re: strncpy and 'n' Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-02-16 19:34 +0100
        Re: strncpy and 'n' "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-02-16 20:58 +0100
  Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-16 10:01 -0800
    Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-16 11:10 -0800
      Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-16 14:20 -0800
        Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-17 04:19 -0800
          Re: strncpy and 'n' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-17 10:04 -0500
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-17 10:27 -0800
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-17 11:22 -0800
              Re: strncpy and 'n' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-17 14:40 -0500
                Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-18 02:17 -0800
    Re: strncpy and 'n' jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-19 20:04 +0000
      Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-19 12:33 -0800
        Re: strncpy and 'n' jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-20 21:25 +0000
          Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-20 14:46 -0800
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-23 23:13 +0000
              Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-23 16:20 -0800
              Re: strncpy and 'n' Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-02-25 00:26 -0800
              Re: strncpy and 'n' pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-02-26 01:34 +0000
                Re: strncpy and 'n' Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-28 22:46 +0000
                Re: strncpy and 'n' jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-03-01 00:03 +0000
                Re: strncpy and 'n' Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-01 12:03 +0000
          Re: strncpy and 'n' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-20 17:51 -0500
        Re: strncpy and 'n' Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 18:14 -0500
          Re: strncpy and 'n' pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-20 23:16 -0500
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-25 01:51 -0500
              Re: strncpy and 'n' pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-25 10:34 -0500
        Re: strncpy and 'n' Rich Webb <bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> - 2012-02-20 19:09 -0500
          Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-20 16:46 -0800
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Rich Webb <bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> - 2012-02-20 20:48 -0500
          Re: strncpy and 'n' Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 19:46 -0500
        Re: strncpy and 'n' jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-21 21:46 +0000
          Re: strncpy and 'n' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-21 17:15 -0500
          Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-21 14:29 -0800
            Re: strncpy and 'n' Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-22 01:15 -0800
            Re: strncpy and 'n' jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-23 00:02 +0000
              Re: strncpy and 'n' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-22 17:02 -0800
  Re: strncpy and 'n' Markus Schaub <usenet@markus-schaub.de> - 2012-02-16 18:53 +0000
  Re: strncpy and 'n' lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-02-16 13:25 -0500
  Re: strncpy and 'n' blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-16 11:18 -0800
  Re: strncpy and 'n' Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-16 13:29 -0600
    Re: strncpy and 'n' Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-02-16 22:45 +0000
  Re: strncpy and 'n' ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 11:32 -0800
  Re: strncpy and 'n' Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-17 00:50 -0800

csiph-web