Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) |
| Date | 2012-01-08 05:19 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jeb91k$nao$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <33269556.1062.1325935591686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prak33> <20120107093130.782@kylheku.com> <slrnjghdrh.1fni.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> |
On 07/01/12 21:24, Seebs wrote: > On 2012-01-07, Kaz Kylheku<kaz@kylheku.com> wrote: >> Autoconf is a braindamaged pile of crap designed by imbeciles, but naive >> developers keep trusting that it will take care of their build problems >> somehow. > > This is unduly harsh. Autoconf is not nearly as stupid as it looks; it's just > that 90% of the things it does which look stupid are only sensible if you > assume that it matters whether stuff builds on Ultrix or SVR2. Which most of > the stuff using it wouldn't anyway. > > (Not really C-related directly, but many C programmers get stuck trying to > outsmart autoconf.) > > -s Or you can write POSIX-compliant code, refuse to support non-POSIX-compliant platforms, and chuck Autoconf in /dev/dustbin where it belongs. Besides, even if you believe Autoconf's use case is valid, Autoconf is not a well-designed solution to that problem; simply put, it's hairy. -e -- 'sane', adj.: see 'unimaginative' on the web - http://jttlov.no-ip.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 03:26 -0800
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-01-07 16:26 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-01-07 17:40 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-07 17:50 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-07 21:24 +0000
[OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 05:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-08 09:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-08 23:09 +0100
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-09 07:53 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-01-08 07:13 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 02:12 -0800
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-09 15:00 +0100
csiph-web