Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #15566

[OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory)

From ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory)
Date 2012-01-08 05:19 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jeb91k$nao$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <33269556.1062.1325935591686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prak33> <20120107093130.782@kylheku.com> <slrnjghdrh.1fni.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/01/12 21:24, Seebs wrote:
> On 2012-01-07, Kaz Kylheku<kaz@kylheku.com>  wrote:
>> Autoconf is a braindamaged pile of crap designed by imbeciles, but naive
>> developers keep trusting that it will take care of their build problems
>> somehow.
>
> This is unduly harsh.  Autoconf is not nearly as stupid as it looks; it's just
> that 90% of the things it does which look stupid are only sensible if you
> assume that it matters whether stuff builds on Ultrix or SVR2.  Which most of
> the stuff using it wouldn't anyway.
>
> (Not really C-related directly, but many C programmers get stuck trying to
> outsmart autoconf.)
>
> -s
Or you can write POSIX-compliant code, refuse to support 
non-POSIX-compliant platforms, and chuck Autoconf in /dev/dustbin where 
it belongs.
Besides, even if you believe Autoconf's use case is valid, Autoconf is 
not a well-designed solution to that problem; simply put, it's hairy.
-e
-- 
'sane', adj.: see 'unimaginative'
   on the web - http://jttlov.no-ip.org

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 03:26 -0800
  Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
    Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-01-07 16:26 +0000
    Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-01-07 17:40 +0000
  Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-07 17:50 +0000
    Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-07 21:24 +0000
      [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 05:19 +0000
        Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-08 09:15 +0000
          Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-08 23:09 +0100
            Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-09 07:53 +0000
            Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-09 19:21 +0000
    Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-01-08 07:13 +0000
    Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 02:12 -0800
      Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-09 15:00 +0100

csiph-web