Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) |
| Date | 2012-01-08 09:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87d3auzhay.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <33269556.1062.1325935591686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prak33> <20120107093130.782@kylheku.com> <slrnjghdrh.1fni.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> <jeb91k$nao$1@dont-email.me> |
ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> writes: > On 07/01/12 21:24, Seebs wrote: >> On 2012-01-07, Kaz Kylheku<kaz@kylheku.com> wrote: >>> Autoconf is a braindamaged pile of crap designed by imbeciles, but naive >>> developers keep trusting that it will take care of their build problems >>> somehow. >> >> This is unduly harsh. Autoconf is not nearly as stupid as it looks; it's just >> that 90% of the things it does which look stupid are only sensible if you >> assume that it matters whether stuff builds on Ultrix or SVR2. Which most of >> the stuff using it wouldn't anyway. >> >> (Not really C-related directly, but many C programmers get stuck trying to >> outsmart autoconf.) >> >> -s > Or you can write POSIX-compliant code, refuse to support > non-POSIX-compliant platforms, and chuck Autoconf in /dev/dustbin > where it belongs. Even then you need to do some of the things that Autoconf does - for example when different versions of libraries have a different interface. > Besides, even if you believe Autoconf's use case is valid, Autoconf is > not a well-designed solution to that problem; simply put, it's hairy. Agreed. But it's something that is likely to be there and that can do what you need doing (along with a lot of stuff you don't and never will). -- Online waterways route planner | http://canalplan.eu Plan trips, see photos, check facilities | http://canalplan.org.uk
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 03:26 -0800
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-01-07 16:26 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-01-07 17:40 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-07 17:50 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-07 21:24 +0000
[OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-08 05:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools (Was: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory) Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-08 09:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-08 23:09 +0100
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-09 07:53 +0000
Re: [OT] Bashing on autotools Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2012-01-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-01-08 07:13 +0000
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory ArifulHossain tuhin <etothepowerpi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 02:12 -0800
Re: Building a sample application with libraries located in nonstandard directory Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-01-09 15:00 +0100
csiph-web