Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #12303

Re: C++ source code compilation

From "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: C++ source code compilation
Date 2011-12-10 14:28 +0000
Organization Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID <jbvqbh$992$1@adenine.netfront.net> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <L5udnSYSm7coBn_TnZ2dnUVZ8g2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <jbudvp$1nk7$1@adenine.netfront.net> <X9ydnWNYr4Pnz37TnZ2dnUVZ8rCdnZ2d@giganews.com> <jbvnq4$5g2$1@adenine.netfront.net> <VcadneUJBaE2-n7TnZ2dnUVZ7o6dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Leigh Johnston" <leigh@i42.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:VcadneUJBaE2-n7TnZ2dnUVZ7o6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 10/12/2011 13:45, Paul <pchrist wrote:
<snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No both are not right. Object code is not machine code, it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that resembles machine code but it's not machine code as it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by any cpu on this planet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        I think I know what happened here. When someone said 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains compiled machined code, you erroneously thought that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> meant
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an object file is directly executable as-is. Thus in your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> typical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopath
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner you loudly and proudly objected to the notion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No what was said was that a compiler directly outputs machine
>>>>>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Read back you bafoon.<snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A compiler directly outputs objects files and object files
>>>>>>>>>>> typically
>>>>>>>>>>> contain relocatable machine code ergo compilers typically 
>>>>>>>>>>> directly
>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>> machine code.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If a newgroup post contains C++ code , do you call that message a
>>>>>>>>>> C++
>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>> file? No!
>>>>>>>>>> If a file has a section that contains some machine code, this
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> neccessarily make that file machine code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Earlier I posted:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "A linker links object files produced by the compiler together and
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> object file contains machine code."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To which you replied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Object files do not contain machine code. * Shakes head in
>>>>>>>>> disbelief*"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you are now finally admitting your mistake: objects files
>>>>>>>>> typically
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>> indeed contain machine code; well done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The compiler outputs a file that contains object code, not machine
>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You think you being smart calling object files(which contain object
>>>>>>>> code)
>>>>>>>> machine code.
>>>>>>>> Object code != machine code.
>>>>>>>> Object code is object code.
>>>>>>>> Machine code is machine code
>>>>>>>> They are different things, understand this please and stop calling
>>>>>>>> object
>>>>>>>> code, machine code. you fuckin half wit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh so you were not admitting your mistake after all; oh well, not 
>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>> surprising considering that you are so dense that you have your own
>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>> horizon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What mistake?
>>>>>> The only mistake is yours here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What part of your child like brain makes you think that object code 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> machine code are the same thing?
>>>>>> This is obviously what you are suggesting.
>>>>>> You obviously think that a compilers' output is machine code yet also
>>>>>> object
>>>>>> code, so ask yourself...why do they have different names? Why
>>>>>> distinguish
>>>>>> between any different coding specificatons at all . All code is the
>>>>>> same
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> at the end of the day as it will all be read by some machine after
>>>>>> enough
>>>>>> translations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate repeating myself but you seem to have memory problems so again
>>>>> from
>>>>> Wikipedia:
>>>>>
>>>>> "An object file is a file containing relocatable format /machine code/
>>>>> that is usually not directly executable."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We've already estaiblished what may be contained within an object file.
>>>> The
>>>> problem is that your limited brain capacity doesn't allow you to
>>>> understand
>>>> that 'containing reallocatable format machine code' doesn't actually 
>>>> mean
>>>> the that the file, as a whole, is machine code.
>>>
>>> You have introduced a straw man: I never claimed that an object file as 
>>> a
>>> whole is machine code; I claimed (and still do) that an object file
>>> contains machine code.  From an earlier post of mine:
>>>
>> That's absolute bullshit.
>
> Untrue.
>
>> You said that the compiler directly outputs machine code.
>
> Correct I did; the compiler directly outputs an object file that contains 
> machine code ergo you can say that the compiler directly outputs machine 
> code however this is actually another straw man attempt of yours: the 
> context of "directly" in that post of mine was related to the OP which was 
> about a compiler that produced C code as an intermediate which is then 
> also compiled.
>
>> Now you are saying well it doens't really output machine code it ouptputs
>> soemthing else that contains machine code.
>
> I have not changed what I am saying; again I said:
>
> "Again with the trolling bullshit; object files typically contain 
> relocatable machine code /among other things/."
>
>>
>>> "Again with the trolling bullshit; object files typically contain
>>> relocatable machine code /among other things/."
>>>
>>
>>
>> I've already told you that doens't mean the object file, as a whole, is
>> machine code.
>
> You are repeating yourself.  You are telling us something that we already 
> know.
>
>> Can the output form the compiler be run on a machine? No.
>
> Correct.
>
>> Is it designed to be run on a machine? No.
>
> Correct.
>
>> Is it machine code? No
>
> Incorrect straw man. Part of a compiler's output is relocatable machine 
> code along with, among other things, relocation metadata all contained 
> within an object file.
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a windows machine and VC++, ok so I compile a basic program and
>>>> produce an object file.
>>>> How exactly do you run this object file if it is trully machine code?
>>>
>>> Nobody has claimed that an object file is directly executable this does
>>> not mean that it doesn't contain (relocatable) machine code however.
>>
>> If it doesn't run on any machine and is not intended to be run on a 
>> machine
>> perhaps thats because its not machine code.
>
> Machine code was different forms; one form of machine code is machine code 
> that requires relocation and until it is relocated it would make no sense 
> to execute it.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Are you suggesting its machine code but it cannot be run on any single
>>>> machine on the planet?
>>>
>>> As I have said already object files typically contain relocatable 
>>> machine
>>> code that cannot be run (it still requires linking).
>>
>> If it doesn't run on amchine , its not a machine code file.
>> It doesn't matter if it contains some machine instructions witihin the 
>> file,
>> that code has yet to be retranslated before it becomes machine code.
>
> As far as I can tell "machine instructions" and "machine code" are 
> synonyms.  Perhaps you should define your terms exactly so that we can 
> understand what the fuck you are trying to say.
>
My definition of machine code is code that runs on a machine.
An object file, that requires further translation before being read by a 
machine, is not machine code.
How can you call something machine code when it's not code that can be run 
on a machine?

I think you are pretty stupid if you can't understand this. Once again you 
persist that because the file contains some machine intructions it IS 
machine code, which is utterly incorrect.








--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

C++ source code compilation Sheky <shekhar07.nitdgp@gmail.com> - 2011-12-06 08:49 -0800
  Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-06 17:06 +0000
    Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-07 07:39 +0000
      Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 14:11 +0000
      Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 17:37 +0000
        Re: C++ source code compilation ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-12-07 12:28 -0600
          Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-07 11:04 -0800
          Re: C++ source code compilation Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-12-07 19:53 +0000
            Re: C++ source code compilation Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 20:41 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-12-08 19:48 +0000
          Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-07 14:56 -0600
            Re: C++ source code compilation ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-12-07 16:09 -0600
          Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 22:27 +0000
            Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-08 09:28 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 13:39 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 06:26 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 10:55 +0000
          Re: C++ source code compilation Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-08 03:41 -0800
            Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 13:42 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 13:56 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 14:11 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 14:21 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 08:38 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 00:39 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 00:31 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 12:12 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-08 08:56 -0800
              Re: C++ source code compilation Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-09 05:23 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 14:16 +0000
            Re: C++ source code compilation ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-12-08 08:02 -0600
              Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-08 13:18 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-12-09 11:43 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-09 17:24 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-12-09 18:06 -0600
    Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 17:39 +0000
      Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 18:02 +0000
        Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-07 14:58 -0600
        Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 22:20 +0000
          Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 22:42 +0000
            Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 01:54 +0000
          Re: C++ source code compilation John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-12-07 16:55 -0600
            Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-07 22:58 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-12-07 20:52 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 05:09 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 05:15 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-12-08 11:37 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 00:45 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-12-10 21:46 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-12-11 16:01 +0100
            Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 01:59 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-08 09:35 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-12-08 12:43 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 06:31 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-09 19:40 +1300
                Re: C++ source code compilation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 23:47 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-12-09 02:29 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation Tobias Müller <troplin@bluewin.ch> - 2011-12-09 07:23 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 23:46 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 09:24 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 11:01 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 12:23 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 10:58 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 12:35 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 12:44 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 04:55 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 14:20 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 14:33 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 14:58 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 15:11 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-10 07:59 +1300
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 15:09 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 19:36 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 19:53 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-10 10:03 +1300
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 21:10 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 14:06 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 23:04 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 23:15 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 23:37 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 01:51 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-10 09:51 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 13:50 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 08:53 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 20:17 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 12:37 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 13:45 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-10 13:49 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 14:37 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 08:55 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 14:07 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 14:28 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 14:50 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 14:54 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 15:17 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 18:13 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 18:36 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 22:34 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 22:46 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 23:25 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 23:30 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 03:23 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 09:12 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-12 10:05 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-12 12:05 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-12 12:58 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 13:29 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 20:33 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-11 07:14 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 09:07 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Tobias Müller <troplin@bluewin.ch> - 2011-12-10 14:52 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-10 15:24 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 09:05 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-11 09:01 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 20:22 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-12 10:11 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 15:08 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-09 15:08 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-08 02:53 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-08 05:16 -0600
                Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-08 03:50 -0800
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-08 14:01 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 06:35 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-09 11:06 +0000
                Re: C++ source code compilation Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 12:38 +0000
          Re: C++ source code compilation Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2011-12-11 12:41 -0800
            Re: C++ source code compilation Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-11 21:02 +0000
            Re: C++ source code compilation "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-12-12 02:19 +0000
              Re: C++ source code compilation 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-11 20:02 -0800
  Re: C++ source code compilation red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2011-12-06 09:15 -0800
    Re: C++ source code compilation Sheky <shekhar07.nitdgp@gmail.com> - 2011-12-06 10:29 -0800
      Re: C++ source code compilation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-06 12:39 -0600
        Re: C++ source code compilation Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-06 13:51 -0500
  Re: C++ source code compilation Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2011-12-06 14:47 -0800

csiph-web