Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #828

Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <javfb6$h2p$1@dont-email.me>, Krzysztof Mitko <fakemail@krzysztof.at.eml.dot.cc> wrote: 

> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.misc.]
> no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
> > For bandwidth considerations and to avoid dancing-cartoons-in-ya-face
> > I mostly use `lynx` instead of a 'proper' browser.
> > And normally I can even do blog-comments with `lynx`.
> >
> > But this one has got me confused:-
> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8917915/It-is
> > -now-becoming-clear-Germany-has-had-enough-of-this-euro-
> > mess.html#disqus_thread
> >
> > My understanding from some blog where this works, was that 
> >     <URL>:comment
> > positions lynx's cursor at <comment> on the downloaded page of
> > <URL>, on my screen.
> >
> > Importantly, original article and all the current comments are
> > 'on' [and hence downloaded] the <URL> 'page'.
> >
> > With this other/newer/fancy method, lynx fails to get the
> > list of comments via <URL>.
> >
> > How does it get to the comment-list via: <URL>#disqus_thread ?
> >
> > What's the RFC for this?
> 
> AFAIK Disqus is a JavaScript comment engine and won't work on lynx.
> 
> -- 
> Z pozdrowieniami,
> Krzysztof Mitko
Ok, so then with JavaScript you've got the freedom to do anything,
and you're not restricted to a RFC.
And the game is determined by the current fad.
So if the market dominator introduces a new facility, others
must follow, or fall out?

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-28 07:11 +0000
  Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Krzysztof Mitko <fakemail@krzysztof.at.eml.dot.cc> - 2011-11-28 08:04 +0000
    Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-28 15:25 +0000
      Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 10:48 -0600
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-11-28 14:40 -0500
          Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 16:13 -0600
            Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 16:27 -0600
              Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:36 +0000
            Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-11-30 09:24 -0500
              Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-30 14:37 +0000
          Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:34 +0000
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-11-28 17:50 -0500
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2011-11-29 08:23 +0200
          Re (2): Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-12-01 13:25 +0000
      Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:32 +0000

csiph-web