Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #843

Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'?

From Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'?
Date 2011-11-30 09:24 -0500
Organization Institute for Regimented Whimsey
Message-ID <jb5eb70si9@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <javfb6$h2p$1@dont-email.me> <jb0964$91k$1@dont-email.me> <3JKdnR_Vd-_AJk7TnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@supernews.com> <jb0o3r0gav@news2.newsguy.com> <2ImdnRrr-5AJmknTnZ2dnUVZ8nGdnZ2d@supernews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Deux wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:40:43 -0500, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> 
>> I solved that. If a page does not render, I give up on that site. I buy
>> whatever it is from another vendor, or do not buy it at all. So it costs
>> them not to support my browser (Firefox). They may not know they lost a
>> sale because of their browser arrogance, but it costs them nonetheless.
> 
> Try factoring in the cost of extra development work needed, such as 
> planning, build, testing, maintenance. How much revenue would they 
> make from Lynx users?
> 
> Their browser arrogance would probably save them money.
> 
Maybe. I find web sites that will not accept Linux Firefox browsers at
all, or will not put out HTML that Firefox can render.

-- 
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
 ^^-^^ 09:20:01 up 23:08, 4 users, load average: 4.61, 4.83, 5.00

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-28 07:11 +0000
  Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Krzysztof Mitko <fakemail@krzysztof.at.eml.dot.cc> - 2011-11-28 08:04 +0000
    Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-28 15:25 +0000
      Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 10:48 -0600
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-11-28 14:40 -0500
          Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 16:13 -0600
            Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Deux <deux@none.none> - 2011-11-28 16:27 -0600
              Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:36 +0000
            Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-11-30 09:24 -0500
              Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-30 14:37 +0000
          Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:34 +0000
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-11-28 17:50 -0500
        Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2011-11-29 08:23 +0200
          Re (2): Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-12-01 13:25 +0000
      Re: Strange blog-comment URL 'mechanism'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-29 00:32 +0000

csiph-web