Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #11651
| From | "Jo" <none@none.none> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? |
| Date | 2011-11-21 01:08 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jacte1$4nn$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jaa0p5$u4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <25bfb5f1-bc1e-4f62-afd9-ec68cd48227a@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> |
Nick Keighley wrote: > On Nov 20, 4:47 am, "Jo" <n...@none.none> wrote: > >> Why is progress so slow on making C++ a "good" language? > > what's a "good language"? > Don't beg me to slap you in the face. Cuz I might hire someone to do that. :P >> The only reason >> I can fathom is that people are milking it for all it's worth in >> terms of paychecks. (I'm totally serious). > > if you don't like it use something else It does seem to be my personal problem. That is first thing you have ever said that makes any sense. Touche. Read: don't let it blow up your head, bitch.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-19 22:47 -0600
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-20 07:07 -0800
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:08 -0600
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-11-21 17:53 +0000
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-20 18:03 +0100
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:14 -0600
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? Andy Champ <no.way@nospam.invalid> - 2011-11-20 20:25 +0000
Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:16 -0600
csiph-web