Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today?

From	"Jo" <none@none.none>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today?
Date	2011-11-21 01:16 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<jactsp$5oq$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<jaa0p5$u4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <UY-dnVIfAYq-_1TTnZ2dnUVZ8gudnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

Andy Champ wrote:
> On 20/11/2011 04:47, Jo wrote:
>> Why is progress so slow on making C++ a "good" language? The only
>> reason I can fathom is that people are milking it for all it's worth
>> in terms of paychecks. (I'm totally serious).
>>
>>
>
> The C++ of today could not have been compiled in reasonable time in a
> machine of 10 years ago.  I would not be surprised if the same could
> be said in another 10 years.
>

I shouldn't post tonight.... I'm much better angry than "tearful" (for 
the "lame", it means 'crying'). So don't fuck with me. Because you can't 
handle the truth.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-19 22:47 -0600
  Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-20 07:07 -0800
    Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:08 -0600
      Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-11-21 17:53 +0000
  Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-20 18:03 +0100
    Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:14 -0600
  Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? Andy Champ <no.way@nospam.invalid> - 2011-11-20 20:25 +0000
    Re: Anyone want to bet that C++ won't be 10 times less significant in 5 years than it is today? "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:16 -0600

csiph-web