Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #13550

Hypocrites

Show all headers | View raw

In the thread

"Deleting first N lines from a text file"

I published an answer to that problem using the C containers library.

I received (as is very often the case) an answer from an anonymous
coward telling me

<quote>
You self-celebrating fucko. There only exist your things to you:
that silly lcc-win and your funny containers.
<end quote>

I did not bother to answer.

The same anonymous coward sent an answer (with the same insults)
to another thread where I asked for feedback on the gcc implementation
for printf customization.

In that thread Seebs answered obviously NOT to condemn the insults
but to add to them. Talking with the anonymous coward he wrote:

<quote from seebs>
I have Mr. Navia plonked because of his habit of random and unjustified
flames, so I thank you for calling that post to my attention
<end quote>

So, in the logic of this person (seebs), insulting me as "self-
celebrating fucko" is a motive to answer him a "THANK YOU".

And in the same sentence he writes about "unjustified flames" I would
start. Unjustified of course.

This tactic (The victim is responsible, if you get insulted and you do
not accept those insults in silence it is YOUR fault) is the same in
the other "regulars" that infest this group, Kicki, Seebs, and all others.

To avoid being too obvious, Seebs quoted the anonymous troll but
*snipped the insults away*.

This anonymous posts are obviously done by Kicki, seebs, and others
to avoid consequences and having the "pleasure" of insulting without
having to face any consequences.

This "character assassination" campaigns is similar to the one
he started against a book author some years ago.

What can you do to stop this?

This people thrive on the silence of the other members of
this discussion group, and live only in this discussion
group. They are unable to do anything productive (Seebs
has never published anything, neither Kicki, or any other
of those people) but they are able to insult the ones that
propose technical solutions like my container library or
my compiler system.

jacob

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hypocrites jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-17 13:11 +0100
  Re: Hypocrites jgharston <jgh@arcade.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-17 05:13 -0800
  Re: Hypocrites Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-17 14:17 +0100
    Re: Hypocrites Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-17 18:48 +0000
  Re: Hypocrites Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-17 06:14 -0800
    Re: Hypocrites gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-17 14:33 +0000
  Re: Hypocrites Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 05:47 -0800
    Re: Hypocrites Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 07:51 -0800
    Re: Hypocrites Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-17 18:48 +0000
  Re: Hypocrites blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 15:58 +0000
    Re: Hypocrites BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 11:49 -0800
      Re: Hypocrites gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-17 21:40 +0000
        Re: Hypocrites BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 14:14 -0800
  Re: Hypocrites Oliver Jackson <chexmofo@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-17 09:37 -0800
  Re: Hypocrites Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-18 09:26 +1300
    Re: Hypocrites Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-18 16:43 +0200
      Re: Hypocrites Acid Washed China Blue Jeans <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-18 11:12 -0800
  Re: Hypocrites Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-11-17 16:51 -0800
  Re: Hypocrites nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 08:41 -0800

csiph-web