Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #12772

Re: newby question on C I/O

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/05/2011 02:52 AM, Ike Naar wrote:
> On 2011-11-05, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:
>> 	    while(fscanf(infile, "%f%f%3s\n",
>> 	        values[j], costs[j], statuses[j]) == 3)
> 
> The infamous scanf trap :-)
> 
>   	        &values[j], &costs[j], statuses[j]) == 3)

Sorry for the mistake. I don't use fscanf() very often, and not just
because of the problems I mentioned with out-of-range numeric values.
For the last 15 years, most of the files my programs read are in HDF-EOS
format, which they read using third-party library functions. Most of the
rest are in  CCSDS Production Data Se format, which they read using fread().

> Just curious: is the trailing "\n" in the fscanf format useful,
> or would the behaviour be the same if it were omitted?

I remember reaching the conclusion, a decade or two ago, that it did
have some useful effect, but I can't find support for that concept by
reading the standard's description of fscanf(). I believe I was assuming
that a white-space directive requires the presence of at least one
corresponding character of white-space, but I can't find explicit
wording to that effect.
-- 
James Kuyper

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 15:07 -0700
  Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-04 20:50 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 18:57 -0700
    Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:10 -0800
      Re: newby question on C I/O Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 14:47 +1300
      Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-08 01:52 +0000
      Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-07 20:56 -0500
        Re: newby question on C I/O Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 20:27 +0000
          Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-08 20:48 -0500
          Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 11:12 +0000
            Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 07:02 -0500
              Re: newby question on C I/O Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-09 16:12 +0000
        Re: newby question on C I/O - SUCCESS "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 16:12 -0800
  Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-04 21:46 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-11-05 06:52 +0000
      Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-05 04:13 -0700
      Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-05 08:16 -0400
        Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:21 -0400
      Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:13 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 02:39 -0500
      Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 10:05 -0500
        Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:40 -0500
  Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-06 21:23 +0000
  Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 18:00 -0800
    Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 01:35 -0800
      Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 11:26 +0000
        Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 04:41 -0800
          Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 14:14 +0000
            Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 07:02 -0800
              Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 15:44 +0000

csiph-web