Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: newby question on C I/O |
| Date | 2011-11-05 06:52 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrn3vfsjb9na4.b8e.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> (permalink) |
| References | <0f0ee88e-09f4-43ca-8c95-84f9a4846455@c1g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> <j924gs$d7s$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2011-11-05, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote: > while(fscanf(infile, "%f%f%3s\n", > values[j], costs[j], statuses[j]) == 3) The infamous scanf trap :-) &values[j], &costs[j], statuses[j]) == 3) Just curious: is the trailing "\n" in the fscanf format useful, or would the behaviour be the same if it were omitted?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 15:07 -0700
Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-04 20:50 -0400
Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 18:57 -0700
Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:10 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 14:47 +1300
Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-08 01:52 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-07 20:56 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 20:27 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-08 20:48 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 11:12 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 07:02 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-09 16:12 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O - SUCCESS "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 16:12 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-04 21:46 -0400
Re: newby question on C I/O Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-11-05 06:52 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-05 04:13 -0700
Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-05 08:16 -0400
Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:21 -0400
Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:13 -0400
Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 02:39 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 10:05 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:40 -0500
Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-06 21:23 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 18:00 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 01:35 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 11:26 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 04:41 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 14:14 +0000
Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 07:02 -0800
Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 15:44 +0000
csiph-web