Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #756
| From | fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? |
| Date | 2011-11-02 11:24 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j8r98v$2fc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnjb1aed.1bk.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
In article <slrnjb1aed.1bk.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>, Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-02, fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote: > > I need to know what is recommended practice for <quitting>. > > It's a bit unclear to me what you're talking about -- you're > mentioning a lot of different things. > If you included the part which confuses you, one could focus. > If you're talking about the NNTP protocol, best practice is something > like > > - reuse one connection for at least minutes > - but tolerate that the server disconnects you if you're idle > - use the QUIT command to quit > I don't want to dig out the code now but consider the following: "ipNews.ArtGrpNo alt.os.linux.slackware 16497" runs [this is my actual coe-syntax, directly pasted here]; I'll assume that my client doesn't start the next <fetch article> until <alt.os.linux.slackware 16497> has finished d/l-ing, because I naturally concentrated on 'what I get'. But what about the server, if I then run "ipNews.ArtGrpNo comp.os.linux.networking 5942"? Does this open a further "connection" [using the wording of the server]? If the NNTP-server could handle the possibility of the same IP requesting a further article while the first article was still being delivered, which my client does NOT do; then perhaps the protocol was designed for the client to acknowledge the receipt, so that the server, does NOT open a new connection for the next/new request. What else does the server signal "Too many connections from your IP address " ? > For more details, see RFC 3977. > Thanks.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
? Too many connections from your IP address ? fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de - 2011-11-02 01:39 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-02 02:24 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> - 2011-11-02 02:53 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de - 2011-11-02 11:24 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-11-02 11:37 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-02 15:38 +0000
Re: Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-11-02 19:15 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-11-02 09:31 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-02 18:50 +0000
Re: Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-11-03 10:21 +0000
csiph-web