Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #761
| From | no.top.post@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? |
| Date | 2011-11-02 15:38 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j8ro63$5fh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <87liryrc0c.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> |
In article <87liryrc0c.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk>, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes: > > fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote: > > >> I need to know what is recommended practice for <quitting>. > > > > It's a bit unclear to me what you're talking about -- you're > > mentioning a lot of different things. > > > > If you're talking about the NNTP protocol, best practice is something > > like > > > > - reuse one connection for at least minutes > > - but tolerate that the server disconnects you if you're idle > > - use the QUIT command to quit > > > > For more details, see RFC 3977. > > The important point is that the connection must be closed when its > finished with; whether this is done via QUIT (the "preferred method", > though as far as I can see this is just arbitrary bureaucracy) or > closing the connection directly is secondary. > > -- I speculate that: = the correct procedure, to economise on inet resources, is to actively close the connection, instead of relying on time-out. = when I hacked the code, i considered it to be ok, once I'd received the d/l-ed article; but the protocol requires a further 'signal' to notify the server that the send-article has been successfully completed. = while the server is waiting for this missing confirmation, it receives another/several requests from the same IP, and it has been appropriately programmed to identify such multiple requests from a single IP as <an attack>. What do the network experts say? == Chris Glur.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
? Too many connections from your IP address ? fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de - 2011-11-02 01:39 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-02 02:24 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> - 2011-11-02 02:53 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? fld@informatik.uni-bremen.de - 2011-11-02 11:24 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-11-02 11:37 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-02 15:38 +0000
Re: Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-11-02 19:15 +0000
Re: ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-11-02 09:31 +0000
Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-11-02 18:50 +0000
Re: Re (2): ? Too many connections from your IP address ? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-11-03 10:21 +0000
csiph-web