Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8919
| From | "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: maximum cases in a switch ? |
| Date | 2011-08-16 14:01 +0100 |
| Organization | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
| Message-ID | <j2dpo2$3gc$1@adenine.netfront.net> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <j2brqu$o31$1@adenine.netfront.net> <9tCdnZfs3uFkF9TTnZ2dnUVZ8qmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dLWdnag7luznENTTnZ2dnUVZ8jidnZ2d@giganews.com> <j2cjib$1is5$1@adenine.netfront.net> <AKKdnb0LyJI0wNfTnZ2dnUVZ8vsAAAAA@giganews.com> |
"Leigh Johnston" <leigh@i42.co.uk> wrote in message
news:AKKdnb0LyJI0wNfTnZ2dnUVZ8vsAAAAA@giganews.com...
> On 16/08/2011 03:10, Paul wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 525 switch cases seem alot but how long does this take to
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> compute,
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> assuming the very last case is the one that is true?
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Probably
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> long, maybe 3 instructions per conditional test, so it
>>>>>>>>>>>> might be
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> around
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 1500 clock cycles or something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Only if the compiler was as naive as you (for a clue you
>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> learn
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> about jump tables).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From behind which rock have you crawled?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Please explain to us how using a jump table to implement a
>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>> > block
>>>>>>>>>>>> > of 525 cases could possibly take 1500 clock cycles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I already have explained it, obviosly this is a very rough
>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --ITYM "wrong estimate"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is no "right" estimate, a quadcore cpu with precaching and
>>>>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>>>>> fancy tech they have nowadays will probably do it alot faster
>>>>>>>>>>> than an
>>>>>>>>>>> ancient AMD cpu.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you are "wrong" to say my estimate was "wrong".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> as not
>>>>>>>>>>>> all CPU's are the same. Can you explain how many clock cycles
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> think it'd
>>>>>>>>>>>> take?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --the number taken is independent of the number of entries in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> table
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- goto table[i];
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --we're talking half a dozen instructions and a couple of memory
>>>>>>>>>>> --accesses
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Start Process:
>>>>>>>>>>> Load reg1 with comparee (Only done once at start)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Load reg2 with case option
>>>>>>>>>>> Load reg3 with jump address
>>>>>>>>>>> Jump if reg1and reg2 are equal .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> repeat above until the condition is met.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you need to repeat 6 instructions ?
>>>>>>>>>>> And what are you talking about memeory access? L1 cache? or
>>>>>>>>>>> pipeline
>>>>>>>>>>> cache or prefetched queues?
>>>>>>>>>>> Modern CPUs have everything all prefetched into caches and its a
>>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>> more complicated than you seem to understand.
>>>>>>>>>>> You can try to pretend you know more than me about it and I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>> care if you do or don't but when you challenge something I
>>>>>>>>>>> said as
>>>>>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> and present "your opinion" as right, I'd suggest you get your
>>>>>>>>>>> facts
>>>>>>>>>>> right first and provide some kind of evidence which supports
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> "claim".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Even if your opinion that it was 6x525 clock cycles , for any
>>>>>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>>>>>> CPU,
>>>>>>>>>>> was 100% exact then that would make my estimate close enough
>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>> accurate, because we are talking about cpu speeds in gigahertz
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please don't claim my estimates are "wrong" without providing
>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> kind
>>>>>>>>>>> of reason other that "because you say so".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> His opinion is that it is *just* 6 clock cycles not 6x525 clock
>>>>>>>>>> cycles; your lack of comprehension and naivity is stunning.
>>>>>>>>>> Again:
>>>>>>>>>> learn about jump tables instead of wasting time displaying a
>>>>>>>>>> lack of
>>>>>>>>>> knowledge here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't have a switch statement with 525 cases executed in 6
>>>>>>>>> clock
>>>>>>>>> cycles you fucking moronic idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your insults do nothing to mend your reputation or make your
>>>>>>>> incorrect
>>>>>>>> assertions correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well stop being a moron. The only thing incorrect here is your
>>>>>>> incorrect
>>>>>>> assumption that I was talking about jump tables.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A compiler is free to implement a switch statement anyway it
>>>>>>> likes. All
>>>>>>> I was saying that with the worst case scenario of a 525 switch case
>>>>>>> statement is may be something like 1500 clock cycles which is not
>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>> alot of CPU time anyway, even though 525 cases seems like a lot.
>>>>>>> It may be more it may be less, I don't know how the compiler will
>>>>>>> implement it and neither do you. You do not the full details of the
>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>> , does it have a default statement etc, which compiler is it , blah
>>>>>>> blah
>>>>>>> blah.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So please stop making inciorrect assumptions that I was talking
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> jump tables , and trying to start an argument based on the false
>>>>>>> assumption that you know what a jump table is and I don't.
>>>>>>> I don't know why you havent learned your lesson from the past , I
>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>> you are just going to keep on arguing and creating arguments until
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> actually win one. And before you start bringing up history and
>>>>>>> trying to
>>>>>>> falsify who had he victorious outcome please remember this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> int x = new int[24];
>>>>>>> x is a pointer to an array of integers. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said: "You can't have a switch statement with 525 cases executed
>>>>>> in 6 clock cycles you fucking moronic idiot." (just scroll up). This
>>>>>> assertion is false and I explained why whilst also introducing you to
>>>>>> the concept of jump tables (a thankyou would be nice).
>>>>>
>>>>> The assertion is true.
>>>>> The switch statement does not have ordered cases therefore you could
>>>>> only implement this with a hash table but then you are basically
>>>>> rewriting the software completely and you no longer have a switch
>>>>> statement.
>>>>
>>>> From an earlier reply of mine that you seemed to have ignored:
>>>>
>>>> "For another clue think about the difference between a switch with
>>>> contiguous case values and non-contiguous case values. *Most* switches
>>>> have contiguous case values. If you have a switch with 525
>>>> non-contiguous case values then you may well need 6x525 clock cycles if
>>>> again the solution was naive solution (a non-naive solution would be to
>>>> use binary search on a jump table)."
>>>>
>>>> So your assertion remains false and you continue to fail.
>>>>
>>>> HTH.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Funnily enough I have implemented switch statements in my own
>>> programming language using the binary search method which actually
>>> allowed me to supported mixed case types (other than basic integers):
>>
>> omg , your language?
>> What do you call this language you are creating/have created?
>
> CAWScript; http://www.clicksandwhistles.com/CAWScript.htm
>
>>>
>>> for (int i = 1; i < 4; ++i)
>>> {
>>> var v;
>>> switch(i)
>>> {
>>> case 1:
>>> v = 123;
>>> break;
>>> case 2:
>>> v = "abc";
>>> break;
>>> case 3:
>>> v = 1.01;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> switch(v)
>>> {
>>> case 123L:
>>> print_line(v + " is an integer");
>>> break;
>>> case "abc":
>>> print_line(v + " is a string");
>>> break;
>>> default:
>>> print_line(v + " is a neither an integer nor a string");
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> switch(v)
>>> {
>>> case 123:
>>> case "abc":
>>> print_line(v + " is an integer or a string");
>>> break;
>>> default:
>>> print_line(v + " is a neither an integer nor a string");
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Although off-topic I thought it quite interesting and cromulent to the
>>> discussion.
>>>
>> Is the above code your language or C++?
>
> My language obviously.
>
So this whole excercise has just been one big excuse to advertise your
language?
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 11:03 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2011-08-09 12:27 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 12:23 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-10 12:45 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:09 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-11 12:49 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 10:48 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 18:26 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 11:45 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 20:06 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 14:47 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 22:32 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 06:00 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:49 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 13:46 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:58 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 20:22 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 15:57 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 20:58 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 18:16 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:55 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-16 09:04 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:24 +1200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:33 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:18 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +1200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:37 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 12:02 +1200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-09 16:38 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 15:42 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 15:39 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 23:39 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 17:18 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 20:06 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 06:54 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-10 12:20 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:34 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 20:34 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 21:06 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-11 21:00 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 11:10 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 10:40 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:02 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-11 08:05 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 21:17 +0200
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:12 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-11 11:07 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 00:14 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:54 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 15:26 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-14 18:14 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 01:09 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-15 02:15 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 12:18 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:22 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:38 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 14:06 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:05 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:20 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 20:24 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:09 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:19 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:10 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:08 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:01 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:10 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:07 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:05 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:57 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:07 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:29 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:35 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:01 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 01:23 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-15 13:32 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:20 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:33 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 07:34 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:49 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 15:02 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 16:07 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:50 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:57 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:12 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:34 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 12:55 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:32 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 20:11 +0000
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-18 11:00 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:35 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 06:34 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:23 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 02:01 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:29 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:13 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:18 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:43 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:23 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:31 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:48 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:53 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 07:54 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 20:40 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 10:54 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-17 12:44 -0500
jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 15:18 -0500
Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-17 22:48 +0200
Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 16:49 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2011-08-17 13:50 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 22:04 +0100
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-22 03:23 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 05:51 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 08:45 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-21 16:55 -0700
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-21 23:22 -0500
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-22 08:14 -0400
Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 10:56 -0700
csiph-web