Re: maximum cases in a switch ?

From	"Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: maximum cases in a switch ?
Date	2011-08-17 00:01 +0100
Organization	Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID	<j2essd$1f2l$1@adenine.netfront.net> (permalink)
References	(19 earlier) <AKKdnYILyJKxwNfTnZ2dnUVZ8vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <j2dpft$30b$1@adenine.netfront.net> <TvqdnSQKzboy9tfTnZ2dnUVZ8nSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <j2ecvb$qvm$1@adenine.netfront.net> <WJydnXigNsLvJdfTnZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Leigh Johnston" <leigh@i42.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:WJydnXigNsLvJdfTnZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 16/08/2011 19:29, Paul wrote:
>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> From an earlier reply of mine that you seemed to have ignored:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "For another clue think about the difference between a switch with
>>>>>>> contiguous case values and non-contiguous case values. *Most*
>>>>>>> switches
>>>>>>> have contiguous case values. If you have a switch with 525
>>>>>>> non-contiguous case values then you may well need 6x525 clock cycles
>>>>>>> if again the solution was naive solution (a non-naive solution would
>>>>>>> be to use binary search on a jump table)."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From where to you obtain the info that most switches have contiguous
>>>>>> cases?
>>>>>> This switch does not as the OP said the cases were unordered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not too sure what you mean by a binary search on a jump table, 
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> nonethless my original point was that even with the worst case
>>>>>> scenario
>>>>>> where every case was checked it's stilll not a great deal having 525
>>>>>> conditions to check, with todays CPU's even though it may seem big in
>>>>>> your source code
>>>>>
>>>>> Do a google for: "switch statement" "binary search" sparse cases
>>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure I would begin reading and it say to myslef .."oh yes
>>>> it's just that".
>>>>
>>>> But what is all the fuss about. What exactly are you trying to say now,
>>>> are you still trying to suggest that I do not know what a jump table 
>>>> is?
>>>> Which was your original line of attack.
>>>
>>> What I am trying to say now?? I haven't changed what I am trying to
>>> say at all; I have been quite consistent. Your original assertion was
>>> invalid as most C++ compilers use jump tables when implementing switch
>>> statements and even if we consider the case of a switch with lots of
>>> "unordered" (sparse?) case values
>> What do you mean "even if we consider". That *is* the case we were
>> considering.
>>
>> Typical consistent bullshit, trying to twist the context around to
>> suggest that the original case was considered as an implementation of a
>> jump table when it obviously wasn't.
>>
>
> Interesting that you snipped the second half of my sentence which explains 
> that jump tables (with binary search) can still be used even for a switch 
> with lots of "unordered" case values.
>
> Epic fail.

You are completely arse for elbow.

If you start on the wrong foot it doesn't matter what you say because you 
have already got it wrong by assuming that firstly it is a ordered switch 
case which can be implemented as a jump table, when that is just wrong.
You are the fail here whether its an epic fail or just an average fail I'll 
leave you to decide , you should be an expert on failing by now. 


--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---

Thread

maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 11:03 -0500
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2011-08-09 12:27 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 12:23 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-10 12:45 +0000
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:09 -0400
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-11 12:49 +0000
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 10:48 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 18:26 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 11:45 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 20:06 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 14:47 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 22:32 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 06:00 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:49 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 13:46 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:58 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 20:22 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 15:57 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 20:58 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 18:16 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:55 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-16 09:04 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:24 +1200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:33 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:18 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +1200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:37 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 12:02 +1200
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-09 16:38 +0000
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 15:42 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 15:39 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 23:39 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 17:18 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 20:06 -0400
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 06:54 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-10 12:20 +0000
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:34 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 20:34 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 21:06 +0200
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-11 21:00 +0000
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 11:10 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 10:40 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:02 -0400
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-11 08:05 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 21:17 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:12 -0500
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-11 11:07 +0100
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 00:14 +0100
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:54 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 15:26 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-14 18:14 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 01:09 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-15 02:15 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 12:18 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:22 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:38 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 14:06 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:05 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:20 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 20:24 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:09 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:19 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:10 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:08 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:01 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:10 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:05 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:57 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:29 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:35 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:01 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 01:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-15 13:32 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:20 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:33 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 07:34 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:49 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 15:02 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 16:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:50 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:57 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:12 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:34 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 12:55 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:32 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 20:11 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-18 11:00 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:35 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 06:34 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 02:01 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:29 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:13 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:18 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:43 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:31 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:48 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:53 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 07:54 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 20:40 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 10:54 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-17 12:44 -0500
                jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 15:18 -0500
                Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-17 22:48 +0200
                Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 16:49 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2011-08-17 13:50 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 22:04 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-22 03:23 -0700
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 05:51 -0700
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 08:45 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-21 16:55 -0700
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-21 23:22 -0500
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-22 08:14 -0400
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 10:56 -0700

csiph-web