Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8414
| From | boltar2003@boltar.world |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? |
| Date | 2011-08-02 13:53 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <j18vg8$5ir$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <j18pcq$c4$1@dont-email.me> <j18r7r$qjd$1@speranza.aioe.org> <j18sc9$j6e$1@dont-email.me> <j18tom$14a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <j18uu2$4rc$1@dont-email.me> |
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:43:29 -0400 Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> wrote: >> Congratulations on completely missing my point. > >Which was what, exactly? Try re-reading what I wrote. Who knows, maybe enlightenment will come. > > Using that logic perhaps >> function calls should only allow one function call parameter then? > >Perhaps. Is there logic in that? About as much logic as only allowing one argument in a throw. > > Want to >> pass 2 or more? Just stuff them into a parameter object. Whats the problem? > >There is no problem. There is however, backward compatibility [with C]. As I already stated. Not good at spotting sarcasm are you? >Any more bogus complaints from you? How about the absence of power >operator for built-in arithmetic types? Personally I find the lack of a logical xor operator more annoying. >We're all bound by limitations in our lives. Some limitations are >inherent, some are artificial. All of them serve some kind of purpose. Oh puleease! Spare me your piss poor homily. >it is now. What is the damn point of "commenting on how it was a >missing opportunity"? There are probably hundreds of features that Thats what usenet is about. No one was forcing you to respond. Are you the self appointed moderator of this group or something? Fuck off back under your bridge you pathetic troll. B2003
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 08:49 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 20:55 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:21 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-08-02 19:29 +0900
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:35 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:42 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:08 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 12:40 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:59 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:23 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 09:43 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:53 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? James Lothian <james@firstnamelastname.freeserve.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 07:49 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 10:47 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-08-02 15:43 -0500
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-02 16:12 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:32 +1200
csiph-web