Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8406
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? |
| Date | 2011-08-02 22:42 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <99q2kbFaa6U8@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <j18dm1$p66$1@speranza.aioe.org> <99psbmFaa6U6@mid.individual.net> <j18j47$6k7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <buo1ux4f6ob.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <j18jtm$8ie$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 08/ 2/11 10:35 PM, boltar2003@boltar.world wrote: > On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:29:08 +0900 > Miles Bader<miles@gnu.org> wrote: >> The thing is that the parens are _not_ part of the "throw" statement >> (the syntax of throw is just "throw SOMETHING" -- note, no parens), >> they're just random parens that you can put around any expression. > > I think Stroustrup missed a trick there. It would be very useful to throw > multiple values at the same time instead of having to create an object > to hold them in and throw that. Functions arn't limited to a single argument > so I don't really see a good reason why throw-catch is. Think of throw as more like a return statement than a function call and you'll see that argument dose not make sense. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 08:49 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 20:55 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:21 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-08-02 19:29 +0900
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:35 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:42 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:08 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 12:40 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:59 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:23 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 09:43 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:53 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? James Lothian <james@firstnamelastname.freeserve.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 07:49 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 10:47 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-08-02 15:43 -0500
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-02 16:12 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:32 +1200
csiph-web