Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8402
| From | boltar2003@boltar.world |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? |
| Date | 2011-08-02 10:21 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <j18j47$6k7$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <j18dm1$p66$1@speranza.aioe.org> <99psbmFaa6U6@mid.individual.net> |
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:55:18 +1200 Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote: >> If I have catch(int i, int j) I get a compile error with gcc but the throw >> compiles fine. Also if I have brackets around the throw values it catches >> the 2, if I miss out the brackets it catches the 1. Is it simply treating >> the brackets as a single expression? > >You are seeing the comma operator in action. > >throw(1,2) is throw (1,2). The result of the expression 1,2 is 2. > >throw 1,2 is (throw 1),2. Here the result (2) is discarded. Fair enough, but I'm surprised it doesn't treat comma seperated values as arguments in the same way as a function call would. B2003
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 08:49 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 20:55 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:21 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-08-02 19:29 +0900
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 10:35 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:42 +1200
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:08 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 12:40 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 08:59 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:23 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-02 09:43 -0400
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? boltar2003@boltar.world - 2011-08-02 13:53 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? James Lothian <james@firstnamelastname.freeserve.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 07:49 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-03 10:47 +0100
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-08-02 15:43 -0500
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-02 16:12 +0000
Re: Bug, feature or just accidental? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-02 22:32 +1200
csiph-web