Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.compilers.lcc |
| Subject | Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 |
| Date | 2011-07-18 20:51 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j02kf3$69k$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <25745e00-7d1a-46c1-87ac-fcba0a9bfd04@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <ivv72s$df3$1@dont-email.me> <7cca7deb-9bdc-49b2-93d1-342c0745da36@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <lnfwm4oe2g.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <89bd348c-d39d-478b-bc14-37321a70227e@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/17/2011 5:08 PM, tm wrote:
> [...]
> Eric Sosman wrote:
>> No matter: Neither is your program. Once you invoke undefined
>> behavior, the implementation is not obliged to live up to anything
>> the C Standard promises.
>
> With -Wall gcc complains a little bit:
> Control reaches the end of the non-void function 'main'
> and the function 'get_ident' expects ‘unsigned char *’
> but the argument is of type ‘char *’.
>
> This two things have no influence on the compiler bug.
By my count, that makes two issues you've dismissed as "has no
influence" and "does not make any difference." You may be right (I
will even go so far as to say you are probably right), but one has
to ask: What evidence supports your claims? Would it not have been
simpler to write a Simon-pure demonstration in the first place?
Or was the scent of your prey just too strong in your nostrils?
> I was busy to prepare my new Seed7 release. [...]
> If you are interested, you can download Seed7
> and check it.
Ah, so this is Yet Another Seed Spam. What a surprise.
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 02:58 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-17 08:39 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 09:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-17 13:44 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 11:23 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 11:37 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-17 15:27 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-07-18 10:02 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-18 07:32 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 05:07 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-17 13:19 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-07-17 20:59 +0000
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-17 14:22 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 14:08 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-18 20:51 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-18 23:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-19 08:33 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-17 21:04 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 12:13 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-17 16:44 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 23:48 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 03:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-07-18 12:07 +0100
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-18 09:28 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-18 14:37 +0100
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-18 08:55 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-18 07:42 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-18 18:45 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-19 07:42 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-07-19 11:52 +0000
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-20 06:26 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-07-20 14:25 +0200
csiph-web