Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.compilers.lcc |
| Subject | Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 |
| Date | 2011-07-17 13:19 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnfwm4oe2g.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <fe4067ac-3068-4ef4-867d-2538c59ce488@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <ivul5m$ovk$1@dont-email.me> <25745e00-7d1a-46c1-87ac-fcba0a9bfd04@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <ivv72s$df3$1@dont-email.me> <7cca7deb-9bdc-49b2-93d1-342c0745da36@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> writes:
[...]
> To state it clear:
>
> **** LCC FAILS TO WRITE TRUE WITH THIS IF STATEMENT ****
>
> [snip]
>
> I think the next time I will not spend my time to
> examine a compiler bug, write a test program and
> tell about it. I will just refuse to use that compiler.
Why on Earth would you say that?
Nobody is criticizing you for reporting a bug. Reporting bugs is A
Good Thing. We're just suggesting that a newsgroup (comp.lang.c)
that discusses a programming language is not the best place to do
it, since you're not really talking about the language. Especially
since there's a newsgroup, comp.compilers.lcc that discusses that
particular compiler (both lcc-win32 and the original lcc), and
because it would make more sense to contact the author direction.
Yes, jacob regularly posts here; I'm sure he reularly reads his
e-mail.
It's not even that big a deal. We get a lot of off-topic posts in
clc; yours is far from the worst. Why are you overreacting like
this to the simple suggestion that there are better places for
bug reports?
(Yes, this is cross-posted to a more appropriate newsgroup, but the
original post, and most of the discussion, were just in clc.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 02:58 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-17 08:39 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 09:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-17 13:44 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 11:23 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 11:37 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-17 15:27 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> - 2011-07-18 10:02 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-18 07:32 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 05:07 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-17 13:19 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-07-17 20:59 +0000
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-17 14:22 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 14:08 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-18 20:51 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-18 23:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-19 08:33 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-17 21:04 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 12:13 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-17 16:44 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-17 23:48 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 03:46 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-07-18 12:07 +0100
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-18 09:28 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-18 14:37 +0100
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-18 08:55 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-18 07:42 -0700
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-18 18:45 +0200
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-19 07:42 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-07-19 11:52 +0000
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-20 06:26 -0400
Re: Compiler bug in lcc-win32 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-07-20 14:25 +0200
csiph-web