Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #264416
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit |
| Date | 2015-08-20 20:58 -0500 |
| Organization | Sooper Sekrit Gov'mint Agency. Shhhhhhhh. |
| Message-ID | <ib1dta5g4ec609ermc8t9u2askobv5oekk@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <v7adnY8QpJ-qc0jInZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:11:09 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"The Reported Phone Calls from Barbara Olson"
>
>"The FBI's report on phone calls from AA 77 indicates that she did not reach
>her husband from that flight."
> http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/
>
No, it doesn't. It does make it clear that Ted was wrong when he
first claimed she called from her cell phone. She used the sky phone,
which had not yet been disabled.
Try reading ECO FO878 rather than accepting what some k00k tells
you was/is in it. Or is that too difficult for you? ECO FO878 does use
some big words.
>And people can even download the evidence used in the trial of the 20th
>hijacker so they can see for themselves that we were given BS from Ted Olson
>about the boxcutters.
>
He claims he was told knives and box cutters. There is no way to
KNOW if he was told this or not, of course. But in absence of evidence
to the contrary, we can accept that he was told this.
If you have any legitimate evidence that would impeach what he's
claimed, present it.
>And since the Barbara/Ted Olson phone call was the only one to mention box
>cutters that means all that bullshit about box cutters is total bullshit.
How so? Just because a site you depend on has its information
wrong doesn't mean Ted Olson's claims about what he was told was or is
wrong.
>
>And I could go on and on and on about the bullshit we have been fed from the
>people that hijacked the media after two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers.
But no CGIs rammed anything.
>See the following because only CGIs can perform the maneuver done by the
>alleged Flight 175. <G>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg
You keep presenting this lie as if you think it will work for
you. It has always failed. There is nothing to suggest it will
suddenly start working.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:11 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit joeturn2@yahoo.com - 2015-08-21 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-22 06:04 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-27 23:03 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:09 -0500
csiph-web