Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553693
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change |
| Date | 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iaqcpc-mla.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <McGdnT7wIdS5cV3LnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> <fu32cbdlu7skt1pl44ev4dni01lcgqllvv@4ax.com> <jv52cb5nu9tcmr042j131lsfunn2bobotm@4ax.com> <2eff8e32-0642-4baa-9b8a-48724daaf7d2@googlegroups.com> |
Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 4:17:34 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >> > >> >>What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change >> >>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 >> > >> >What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? >> > >> >The tone of the article seems celebratory. >> > >> >There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. >> > >> >The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have >> >helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. >> > >> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas >> >Politics >> >The county is reliably Democratic. >> >> According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably >> Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died >> unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that >> was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy." >> >> What is wrong with this picture? > > > What is more worrisome is who will be the next to conveniently die with a pillow over their head? > > Double-A Hopefully someone who spams USENET. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:05 -0600
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-14 15:19 -0600
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 16:34 -0500
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-14 21:39 +0000
More fake science from uninformed USA climate trolls 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-14 21:53 +0000
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-14 15:26 -0800
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 18:47 -0500
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 19:17 -0500
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:41 -0500
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 15:56 -0800
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:22 -0600
csiph-web