Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #553693

Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change
Date 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <iaqcpc-mla.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <McGdnT7wIdS5cV3LnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> <fu32cbdlu7skt1pl44ev4dni01lcgqllvv@4ax.com> <jv52cb5nu9tcmr042j131lsfunn2bobotm@4ax.com> <2eff8e32-0642-4baa-9b8a-48724daaf7d2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 4:17:34 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote:
>> 
>> >On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >
>> >>What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change
>> >>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033
>> >
>> >What does this cite tell us about you, Sam?
>> >
>> >The tone of the article seems celebratory.
>> >
>> >There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case.
>> >
>> >The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have
>> >helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination.
>> >
>> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas
>> >Politics
>> >The county is reliably Democratic.
>> 
>> According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably
>> Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died
>> unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that
>> was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy."
>> 
>> What is wrong with this picture?
> 
> 
> What is more worrisome is who will be the next to conveniently die with a pillow over their head?
> 
> Double-A

Hopefully someone who spams USENET.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:05 -0600
  Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-14 15:19 -0600
  Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 16:34 -0500
  Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-14 21:39 +0000
  More fake science from uninformed USA climate trolls 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-14 21:53 +0000
  Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-14 15:26 -0800
  Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 18:47 -0500
    Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 19:17 -0500
      Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:41 -0500
      Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 15:56 -0800
        Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000
        Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:22 -0600

csiph-web