Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #553147 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-14 15:05 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-16 18:22 -0600 |
| Articles | 12 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:05 -0600
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-14 15:19 -0600
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 16:34 -0500
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-14 21:39 +0000
More fake science from uninformed USA climate trolls 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-14 21:53 +0000
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-14 15:26 -0800
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 18:47 -0500
Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-14 19:17 -0500
Re: What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:41 -0500
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 15:56 -0800
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000
Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:22 -0600
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 15:05 -0600 |
| Subject | What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <McGdnT7wIdS5cV3LnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change > http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 > Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia died at a resort in Texas on > Saturday. Scalia, 79, was the court’s conservative leader and his > death means it is now more likely that key EPA rules that aim to curb > climate pollution from the power industry will be upheld. Physics: Increased CO2 ==> increased warming. Law: Does the government have authority to regulate CO2 emissions? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 15:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n9qr27$1htl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
On 2/14/2016 3:05 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change >> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 >> > > >> Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia died at a resort in Texas on >> Saturday. Scalia, 79, was the court’s conservative leader and his >> death means it is now more likely that key EPA rules that aim to curb >> climate pollution from the power industry will be upheld. > > Physics: Increased CO2 ==> increased warming. > > Law: Does the government have authority to regulate CO2 emissions? > > he just voted on that, was he killed for that reason ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 16:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <ojs1cbdusg0gat9hvuv9rcifacktmkcs6d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change >> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 > > >> Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia died at a resort in Texas on >> Saturday. Scalia, 79, was the court’s conservative leader and his >> death means it is now more likely that key EPA rules that aim to curb >> climate pollution from the power industry will be upheld. > > Physics: Increased CO2 ==> increased warming. > > Law: Does the government have authority to regulate CO2 emissions? "The warmistas are not just wrong. They are festeringly evil. They are giggling malevolent monsters, perching and waiting to feast on the bodies of the people, by the billion, they hope to kill."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 21:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <aq87pc-epl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > What Scalia?s Death Means For Climate Change Why wasn't this copied to a group where it would be appropriate? > Physics: Increased CO2 ==> increased warming. Not shown to be true for small changes. > Law: Does the government have authority to regulate CO2 emissions? No. If you think it does, stop breathing. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 21:53 +0000 |
| Subject | More fake science from uninformed USA climate trolls |
| Message-ID | <AH6wy.789048$Mi6.462858@fx35.am4> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change >> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033/posted_by_illiterate_climate_trolls_to_sci.physics More fake science from uninformed USA climate trolls. This is a physics newsgroup where sigma 5 means it is considered science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 15:26 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <ffe31e46-6ff9-4999-b6ef-3fdbd70418b8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 1:05:43 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change > > http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 > > > > Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia died at a resort in Texas on > > Saturday. Scalia, 79, was the court's conservative leader and his > > death means it is now more likely that key EPA rules that aim to curb > > climate pollution from the power industry will be upheld. > > Physics: Increased CO2 ==> increased warming. > > Law: Does the government have authority to regulate CO2 emissions? > Justice Scalia was a giant of constitutional law! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 18:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <fu32cbdlu7skt1pl44ev4dni01lcgqllvv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553147 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change >> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? The tone of the article seems celebratory. There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas Politics The county is reliably Democratic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-14 19:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalias Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <jv52cb5nu9tcmr042j131lsfunn2bobotm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #553193 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote: >On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change >>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 > >What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? > >The tone of the article seems celebratory. > >There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. > >The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have >helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas >Politics >The county is reliably Democratic. According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy." What is wrong with this picture?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 00:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Zxdwy.55918$3C6.48036@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #553196 |
On 02/14/2016 07:17 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>>> What Scalia’s Death Means For Climate Change
>>>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033
>>
>> What does this cite tell us about you, Sam?
>>
>> The tone of the article seems celebratory.
>>
>> There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case.
>>
>> The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have
>> helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas
>> Politics
>> The county is reliably Democratic.
>
> According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably
> Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died
> unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that
> was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy."
>
> What is wrong with this picture?
HEY HVAC! Over here! We got one who is noticing one of your "suicides"
and "natural causes" deaths is just a little too convenient!
Better get over here and make this kook dance! I hear that all kooks are
paranoid conspiracy theorists, even when the conspiracy is real.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 15:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <2eff8e32-0642-4baa-9b8a-48724daaf7d2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #553196 |
On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 4:17:34 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote: > > >On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > > > >>What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change > >>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 > > > >What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? > > > >The tone of the article seems celebratory. > > > >There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. > > > >The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have > >helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. > > > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas > >Politics > >The county is reliably Democratic. > > According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably > Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died > unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that > was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy." > > What is wrong with this picture? What is more worrisome is who will be the next to conveniently die with a pillow over their head? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 00:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <iaqcpc-mla.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #553681 |
Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 4:17:34 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >> > >> >>What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change >> >>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 >> > >> >What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? >> > >> >The tone of the article seems celebratory. >> > >> >There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. >> > >> >The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have >> >helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. >> > >> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas >> >Politics >> >The county is reliably Democratic. >> >> According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably >> Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died >> unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that >> was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy." >> >> What is wrong with this picture? > > > What is more worrisome is who will be the next to conveniently die with a pillow over their head? > > Double-A Hopefully someone who spams USENET. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 18:22 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change |
| Message-ID | <J9udneg_jviqIF7LnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #553681 |
On 2/16/16 5:56 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 4:17:34 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:47:36 -0500, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:05:39 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> >>>> What Scalia's Death Means For Climate Change >>>>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/what-scalias-death-means-for-climate-change-20033 >>> >>> What does this cite tell us about you, Sam? >>> >>> The tone of the article seems celebratory. >>> >>> There should be a careful inquiry into the facts of this case. >>> >>> The investigation should *not* be done by Texans. They may not have >>> helped come to a truthful conclusion about the JFK assassination. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidio_County,_Texas >>> Politics >>> The county is reliably Democratic. >> >> According to some reports, the Texans in charge (in this "reliably >> Democratic" county) were not planning an autopsy on someone who died >> unexpectedly within days after a ruling that was against a policy that >> was to be part of a Democratic administration's "legacy." >> >> What is wrong with this picture? > > > What is more worrisome is who will be the next to conveniently die with a pillow over their head? > > Double-A > Equation shows that large-scale conspiracies would quickly reveal themselves > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-equation-large-scale-conspiracies-quickly-reveal.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web