Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc > #114686
| From | Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) |
| Date | 2021-02-07 21:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <i8avo6FrvchU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <871rduz864.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <rvknql$dvr$2@dont-email.me> <601ef977$0$32757$7b62cf90@news1.net.de> <i8ajimFpjdmU2@mid.individual.net> <AABgIDGJYWIAAAsN.A1.flnews@WStation7.micha.freeshell.org> |
Michael Bäuerle: > Arno Welzel wrote: >> Juergen Ilse: >>> >>> [...] >>> Nein, das Problem entsteht dadurch, dass nicht von allen die "kleinste" (im >>> Sinne von "wenigsten aufwendige") Codierung verwendet wird, die zum codieren >>> des jeweiligen Textes ausreicht (wird das nicht irgendwo auch vorgeschrieben, >>> auch wenn sich fast keiner an diese Regel haelt?). >> >> Nein, es gibt keine solche Regel, dass man nur bestimmte Codierungen >> benutzen soll. Und ob nun ISO-8859-x oder UTF-8 macht bzgl. Aufwand >> keinen substantiellen Unterschied. > > RFC 2046 sagt dazu: > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046#section-4.1.2> > (Kapitel 4.1.2, letzter Absatz) > > | In general, composition software should always use the "lowest common > | denominator" character set possible. For example, if a body contains > | only US-ASCII characters, it SHOULD be marked as being in the US- > | ASCII character set, not ISO-8859-1, which, like all the ISO-8859 > | family of character sets, is a superset of US-ASCII. More generally, > | if a widely-used character set is a subset of another character set, > | and a body contains only characters in the widely-used subset, it > | should be labelled as being in that subset. This will increase the > | chances that the recipient will be able to view the resulting entity > | correctly. Das sagt eigentlich nicht aus, dass man nur einen möglichst einfachen Zeichensatz verwenden soll, sondern dass die angegebene Codierung gemäß MIME den kleinst mögliche Variante passend zum Inhalt verwenden soll. Wenn also ein Text faktisch US-ASCII ist, soll er nicht als ISO-8859-1 oder UTF-8 deklariert werden, selbst wenn das rein technisch zulässig wäre. Dass man aber z.B. für deutsche Umlaute generell ISO-8859-1 nutzen soll, und nicht UTF-8, weil Software möglicherweise ISO-8859-1 beherrscht, aber UFT-8 nicht, ist dort nicht erkennbar. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de
Back to de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Jan Novak <repcom@gmail.com> - 2021-02-04 07:06 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-04 12:17 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-04 18:32 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@inka.de> - 2021-02-04 19:52 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-04 18:08 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Helmut Waitzmann <nn.throttle@xoxy.net> - 2021-02-05 01:25 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-04 23:45 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-05 13:06 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-05 13:08 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Juergen Ilse <news@usenet-verwaltung.de> - 2021-02-06 19:14 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 16:55 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Christian Garbs <mitch@cgarbs.de> - 2021-02-17 22:17 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-17 17:29 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Christian Garbs <mitch@cgarbs.de> - 2021-02-20 17:51 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-07 14:25 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Hans CraueI <crauel_usenet@freenet.de> - 2021-02-04 21:51 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-05 13:08 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Hans CraueI <crauel_usenet@freenet.de> - 2021-02-05 12:27 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-05 17:06 +0100
[OT] trn (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-02-05 18:02 +0100
Re: [OT] trn "Gerald E:scher" <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2021-02-05 17:39 +0000
Re: [OT] trn Hans CraueI <crauel_usenet@freenet.de> - 2021-02-06 00:34 +0000
[OT] trn Hans CraueI <crauel_usenet@freenet.de> - 2021-02-06 00:16 +0000
Re: [OT] trn "Gerald E:scher" <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2021-02-06 23:28 +0000
Re: [OT] trn Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 19:27 -0500
Re: [OT] trn Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-07 14:28 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-05 13:22 -0500
Alte Newsreader (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-05 20:12 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Hans CraueI <crauel_usenet@freenet.de> - 2021-02-06 00:28 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-05 20:12 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2021-02-06 05:20 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-06 13:13 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@x-mail.org> - 2021-02-06 13:18 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 09:24 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@x-mail.org> - 2021-02-06 19:17 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-06 18:19 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@mail.ru> - 2021-02-06 19:30 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 13:50 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@x-mail.org> - 2021-02-06 20:09 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-07 12:43 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-07 14:33 +0100
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@mail.ru> - 2021-02-07 14:55 +0100
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-07 13:10 -0500
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Gernot Griese <ggriese@gmx.de> - 2021-02-07 20:02 +0100
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-07 15:30 -0500
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Gernot Griese <ggriese@gmx.de> - 2021-02-07 21:55 +0100
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-07 17:14 -0500
Jaywalking (was: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches) Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-08 07:40 +0100
Re: OT: Was Grundsaetzliches was: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-08 10:37 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Wolfgang Kynast <wky@gmx.de> - 2021-02-07 08:42 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade klaus reile <klaus.reile@x-mail.org> - 2021-02-07 10:03 +0100
OT (was: Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Andreas Neumann <an5275@sedo.com> - 2021-02-07 12:08 +0200
Re: OT (was: Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade) klaus reile <klaus.reile@mail.ru> - 2021-02-07 11:17 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 09:27 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Paul Muster <exp-311221@news.muster.net> - 2021-02-06 19:50 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2021-02-07 06:21 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-02-07 17:39 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Juergen Ilse <news@usenet-verwaltung.de> - 2021-02-06 20:17 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-02-07 17:41 +0100
[OT] Artikel Codierung (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@gmx.net> - 2021-02-07 19:29 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-02-07 21:09 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-02-08 11:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Michael Ottenbruch <M.Ottenbruch@sailor.ping.de> - 2021-03-09 11:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Helmut Waitzmann <nn.throttle@xoxy.net> - 2021-03-10 11:27 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-03-10 14:35 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Thomas Dorner <de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc.210310.dorner@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-03-10 15:14 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-03-10 16:56 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-03-10 13:36 +0100
Re: [OT] Artikel Codierung Michael Ottenbruch <M.Ottenbruch@sailor.ping.de> - 2021-03-11 09:44 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2021-02-07 21:19 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-07 15:22 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-08 10:39 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Hermann Riemann <nospam.ng@hermann-riemann.de> - 2021-03-09 14:07 +0100
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Juergen Ilse <news@usenet-verwaltung.de> - 2021-02-06 19:53 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2021-02-06 20:36 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 16:58 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 17:00 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Juergen Ilse <news@usenet-verwaltung.de> - 2021-02-07 13:14 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-07 13:04 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade "Gerald E:scher" <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2021-02-06 23:21 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-06 19:26 -0500
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Juergen Ilse <news@usenet-verwaltung.de> - 2021-02-06 19:47 +0000
Re: ubuntu releas-upgrade Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-02-07 20:22 +0100
[OT] Newsreader (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-02-08 11:07 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader (was: ubuntu releas-upgrade) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-02-08 14:27 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-02-08 16:36 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-02-08 21:42 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-08 16:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-02-09 07:27 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Michael Uplawski <michael.uplawski@uplawski.eu> - 2021-02-09 07:47 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2021-02-09 08:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Newsreader Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-02-09 10:46 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Başar Alabay <alabay@gmx.net> - 2021-02-09 12:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Newsreader Thomas Hochstein <thh@thh.name> - 2021-02-09 13:59 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2021-02-09 17:36 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Claus Reibenstein <creibens@gmail.com> - 2021-02-09 15:07 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Klaus von der Heyde <asc.soc@freenet.de> - 2021-02-09 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Newsreader Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-09 07:53 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-09 12:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-09 19:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-09 17:49 -0500
Re: programm zu langsam (war:[OT] Newsreader) Albrecht Mehl <unvalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-10 08:09 +0100
Re: programm zu langsam (war:[OT] Newsreader) Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2021-02-11 03:22 +0100
Re: programm zu langsam (war:[OT] Newsreader) Albrecht Mehl <unvalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-11 07:46 +0100
Re: programm zu langsam (war:[OT] Newsreader) Helmut Waitzmann <nn.throttle@xoxy.net> - 2021-02-11 13:45 +0100
Re: programm zu langsam (war:[OT] Newsreader) Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2021-02-14 05:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-10 12:29 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-10 11:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-02-10 20:28 +0100
Ist "nur" hinreichend oder notwendig? (was: [OT] Newsreader) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-10 16:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Helmut Waitzmann <nn.throttle@xoxy.net> - 2021-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-10 21:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Thomas Hochstein <thh@thh.name> - 2021-02-11 21:39 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-08 22:37 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Thomas Dorner <de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc.210209.dorner@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-02-09 19:36 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-09 21:03 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Thomas Dorner <de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc.210210.dorner@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-02-10 19:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-10 21:42 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-09 17:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Newsreader Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-10 00:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Clemens Schüller <cs.usenet@mailbox.org> - 2021-02-08 22:35 +0100
Re: [OT] Newsreader Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2021-02-10 13:50 +0100
csiph-web