Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #560127

Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups alt.computer.workshop, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough
Date 2020-07-04 17:53 -0700
Message-ID <hmcmk1FgtrvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (18 earlier) <hm6psiF9msiU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsABEF47E06DF7AHT1@rSNu6VvwL.gxU66> <hm94lgFop1fU2@mid.individual.net> <XnsABF0C6AEF472FHT1@mYT06b.5D9m2638aUx0pWnsi8.GG8g0cB8hO293NxM> <hmcjr7FgdcgU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/4/20 5:05 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 7/4/20 4:27 PM, Diesel wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> news:hm94lgFop1fU2@mid.individual.net Fri, 03 Jul 2020 16:28:32 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/3/20 3:58 AM, Diesel wrote:
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> news:hm6psiF9msiU1@mid.individual.net Thu, 02 Jul 2020 19:12:18
>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But it could just be that. Again, I want to be very clear I am
>>>>> NOT accusing anyone of anything -- but it went through my head
>>>>> if Diesel can do as he claims he likely COULD do this and it
>>>>> would be a test to see if the bot was posting. And if he did
>>>>> this he would likely also do it to Carroll... unless he was
>>>>> doing it just to be a jerk (AND AGAIN NOT SAYING THAT IS THE
>>>>> CASE!)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Snit, for the record, I could DDOS you completely offline;
>>>> but why would I waste my shells bandwidth for that...simply
>>>> getting a new IP resolves it.
>>>
>>> But that would not in any way harm the theoretical test I noted.
>>
>> A pointless test, if you spent the time to consider it in more
>> detail.
> 
> It is not that complex:
> 
> 1) Take X offline.
> 2) If bot stops it is evidence coming from X.
> 
> If that goes beyond what you can understand then you are not as 
> technical as you present yourself.

Before your issues with reading comprehension get the better of you, 
again, I do want to be clear I am not suggesting you do this. That would 
be an illegal attack. I do not support that, even against Carroll. I am 
noting the TECHNICAL side, not the MORAL, above. I thought there was a 
CHANCE you were doing this against me (though it was mere speculation 
and not an accusation, and given how things resolved it seems unlikely 
you or anyone else was doing anything of the sort).



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-06-24 05:13 +0000
  Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-06-23 22:34 -0700
  Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 13:02 +0100
    Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 21:52 +0100
      Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
        Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 07:26 -0400
    Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-02 00:45 +0000
      Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-01 18:10 -0700
        Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:09 +0100
          Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 07:38 +0000
            Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:47 +0100
              Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 08:18 +0000
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 09:33 +0100
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 12:12 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough D. Moen <dmoenfactual4@email.net> - 2020-07-02 15:51 -0400
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 20:53 +0100
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 16:00 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2020-07-03 08:53 -0300
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:05 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:53 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:50 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 06:39 -0400
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 03:46 -0700
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:36 -0400
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:44 +0000
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:50 -0400
                Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:53 +0000
          Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
            Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
      Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 14:43 +0100
        Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 15:59 -0700
        Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
          Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-07-04 01:08 +0000
            Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 18:31 -0700
              Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
            Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Jose Soto <emaildumps127.0.1@noemail4me.net> - 2020-07-04 08:23 -0400
            Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000

csiph-web