Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #560104
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.computer.workshop, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough |
| Date | 2020-07-03 18:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hma4g7Fj4bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <ThHIG.67536$iXb1.4658@fx03.ams1> <XnsABEDD3FDE75CFHT1@TP2vv5338EJ4xWGYnB6176y2D6KHSRjVi1ysa.eQUV68drJBT19X0Q9F2923sJ> <hwlLG.21359$pq3.11240@fx25.ams1> <XnsABEF47E0EE781HT1@rSNu6VvwL.gxU66> <hma33nFu2urU2@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/3/20 6:08 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:58:54 +0000, Diesel wrote: > >> And unlike you in so many others. For example, you and I strongly >> disagree on the okay factor concerning lying. I don't think things like >> what you've done for years and what snit has done are okay. You >> disagree. To the point of you're not even calling him out for the lies >> you know damn well he actually wrote about me. Dishonest, David. But, >> that's you, as I've said for years now. I hope the new comers take note >> of this reply, too. <G> >> > > Snit's problem, in a nutshell, is he sees text on the USENET as some kind > of "sea lawyer" problem to solve, where he loses the forest for the trees. I am the one saying we should NOT become obsessed with a specific "tree". In short: you got things exactly backward. > In other words, Snit looks at text with spotlight consciousness, and > doesn't seem to have floodlight consciousness. I do not try to keep track of what happened in 2004, if that is what you mean. Or even 2011. > Snit has also got it in his head that if he has the slightest bit of > perceived (perceived!) evidence for something, he can simply make a claim, > and to hell with the consequences. What a bizarre claim for you to make. But what are the "consequences"? I disagree. OH NO! > And for Snit, conjecture is > "evidence"(!). Incorrect conjecture on your part. I think EVIDENCE is evidence, not conjecture. > He probably doesn't see what he did as an intentional lie > -- that's how bad the brain damage is. What I see is Diesel spoke of things that required the code in response to talking about the Usenet flood bot. He does not want to say he changed topics but he says it does not apply. So he is just throwing a tantrum over it. But whatever. I am happy to move on. > Regarding charity and empathy, I don't think Snit views the USENET as a > connection to other people -- it's just this big text machine that he > interacts with for dopamine dumps. Again, such weird conjecture. > So of course, Snit is a USENET addict. Just look at him. And yet here you are following me and making bizarre conjectures. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-06-24 05:13 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-06-23 22:34 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 13:02 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-06-24 21:52 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 07:26 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-02 00:45 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-01 18:10 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:09 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 07:38 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 08:47 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 08:18 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 09:33 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 12:12 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough D. Moen <dmoenfactual4@email.net> - 2020-07-02 15:51 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 20:53 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 16:00 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2020-07-03 08:53 -0300
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:05 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 17:53 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:50 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 06:39 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 03:46 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:36 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:44 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 07:50 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 11:53 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-02 14:43 +0100
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-02 15:59 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-07-04 01:08 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Jose Soto <emaildumps127.0.1@noemail4me.net> - 2020-07-04 08:23 -0400
Re: Things Have to Breakdown Before They Breakthrough Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-04 23:27 +0000
csiph-web