Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #560092

Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples.

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups alt.computer.workshop, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, talk.politics.guns
Subject Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples.
Date 2020-07-03 09:33 -0700
Message-ID <hm94utFoqhcU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <XnsABEF2ADF62E8AHT1@rSNu6VvwL.gxU66> <hm8anuFjbgmU1@mid.individual.net> <0WDLG.79926$oU.20620@fx26.ams1>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/3/20 3:39 AM, David_B wrote:
...
>>> Rather than any of us here take your detractors words for
>>> anything, including the so called Snit list, let's see if
>>> anything on it is true, and I'll be the guinea pig for the
>>> experiment.
>> 
>> Ah, so Carroll succeeded in getting the list in your mind. A list
>> that has nothing from me in it. He manipulated you. I did warn you
>> about that. Thank you for noting how he successfully got it in you
>> mind.
> 
> I've never read that list!
> 
> I don't like being manipulated.

Feel free to -- just note that it has few if any quotes from me. It has, 
instead, quotes Carroll obsessively scavenged and forged because he 
could not actually show me doing the things he accuses me of.

>>> You mistakenly assumed those degrees would be your friend;
>> 
>> I never brought them up. Again you show how you have been
>> manipulated. Curious. I very much wish I had been wrong.
>> 
>>> that you are superior to anyone else you run across online. Well,
>>> that's "clearly" not the case here, Snit.
>> 
>> Yet you spend your time setting me up as your main villain in your
>>  personal story — using morally juvenile rankings to decide which
>> of us is above the other. You have no idea what that says about you
>> and your views. No inflection is needed, though, to see how you
>> place me in such an important role — as I have noted, while it is
>> not flattery I seek from you it is clearly a form of such. Also
>> explains why you have spent so much time trying to impress me with
>> your skills — yet never really showing you can do anything, even
>> the moral things, you claim you can.
>> 
>> You clearly want me to believe you and respond poorly when I show 
>> doubt or disagreement. You fear letting me down — for example you
>> spoke of what you could find out about the Usenet flood bot, but
>> then showed more excuses then insight. That is fine — as I have
>> said you owe me nothing, just as I owe you nothing.
>> 
>> Meanwhile I am just happy to be civil. I do not need your approval
>> or admiration, I need not beg you to agree with me or lie and say
>> you do. I need not do as you do and set myself up as a grand hero
>> with you as my arch enemy. I do not rank you as better or worse
>> but
>> 
>> Do you even see how much it clearly bothers you to have failed to
>> earn such a position with me? If not, well, before you read your
>> inevitable reply to this post pause and re-read it. See if you can
>> catch how many times you show yourself to be frustrated at a simple
>> disagreement / misunderstanding.
> 
> Oh My!
> 
> You are *SO* much better at teasing him than I have EVER been! ;-)

I have noted that those who troll me tend to not like the responses.

> You should stop though. It's not fair. :-(

He is in a wee bit over his head.

> Dustin has been punished long enough.
> 
> It's time to be nice to one another. OK?

I just posted how I was going to let him have his little foot stamping 
tantrum and I would not respond for a bit. He can declare himself victor 
and insist I ran or whatever games he wants.

When he posts about other topics I might respond to those... but I 
suspect for some time he will be unable to focus on anything other than 
how his trolling backfired as he responds to me.

If so I will just give him more time. I suspect his tantrum can only 
last so long, though he might surprise me on that.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-03 08:08 +0000
  Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:06 +0000
    Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 11:39 +0100
      Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:33 -0700
        Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 20:30 +0100
          Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 19:54 +0000
            Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-03 21:53 +0100
              Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 21:00 +0000
              Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:01 -0700
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-05 08:32 +0100
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-05 08:16 +0000
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 09:06 +0000
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 09:06 +0000
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 07:33 -0700
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 09:06 +0000
                Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-10 05:27 +0000
      Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
    Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
      Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:46 -0700
        Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 09:06 +0000
  Re: Snit: and the lies continue. See here for examples. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-03 09:28 -0700

csiph-web