Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360517
| From | HW@...(HG Wilson) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. |
| Date | 2015-08-13 07:29 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <hgensap8v93repelai70juucsc9scnd5vu@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <63371699-8491-4509-b141-7801139bfca7@googlegroups.com> <opkfsahflg9kudc5j9975b1qel5dhj24hu@4ax.com> <46a102ad-e220-4c03-8500-2141fb8db068@googlegroups.com> <ns8isa1afku369grsd76hqib8hbivi3su6@4ax.com> <14768186-e854-427c-add1-bef6a8b1875a@googlegroups.com> |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:14:32 -0700 (PDT), alsor@interia.pl wrote: >W dniu wtorek, 11 sierpnia 2015 00:24:20 UTC+2 u?ytkownik HG Wilson napisa?: >> They certainly don't understand their own treory. >> >> But nor do you. There is no universal homogeneous aether. > >Unfortunately to yut it's evident in many measurements. No it isn't. If there is a universal aether, how did it get here and where does it end? >> Fields are made of 'aether' (for want of a better word). >> Where fields exist there is an 'aetherlike region' >> in which light speed is modified to some extent, depending >> on field strength. > >I heard long ago about this type of improvisations... >probably made by C.Mead: >http://freespace.virgin.net/ch.thompson1/People/CarverMead.htm > >It's a high speculatory... interpretational ideology rather than any strict, formal theory... >something like these alternative many interpretations in the QM. >These are plainly wrong and superfluous - all without exception. > >Simply: the whole 'interpretational science' is just a stupid nonsense! > >> In remote space, field strengths are below a critical threshold and light >> behave 100% ballistically. > >Is this another assumed/postulated idiocy? :) > >The light is a wave idiot! Light certainly has wavelike properties when intercepted. So do the teeth of a moving sawblade.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-09 11:23 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:25 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-10 14:37 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-11 08:24 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-12 11:14 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-13 07:29 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-13 13:07 -0700
csiph-web