Re: Men are raped more often than women.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns
Subject	Re: Men are raped more often than women.
Date	2019-03-03 10:55 -0700
Message-ID	<ge2ip2Fb9asU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <k30o7elkg3ultnean5epjhp3pd6l5irfdh@4ax.com> <ge2e27Fa7sfU1@mid.individual.net> <am0o7e1b0rac2qf99sp4t353v15pool4cj@4ax.com> <ge2g95Fam8qU3@mid.individual.net> <ho3o7ep04fldrf275p1rtbtbrq2rarphpp@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/3/19 10:34 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 3/3/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/3/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2019, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>>>> Kensi to me:
>>>>>>>> Men are raped more often than women.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BullFUCKINGshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google it, if you can.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> " prison rape accounted for the majority of all rapes committed in the US in 2008 ",
>>>>>> according to The Justice Department.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Greg is right about rape, his libido just went up.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is completely natural and evolutionary-driven for
>>>>> men to engage in rape. It's an expression of power
>>>>> and dominance when it's man-on-man and, when it's
>>>>> man-on-woman, it's an expression of power and
>>>>> alpha male reproductive superiority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Humans are animals first and foremost so trying to
>>>>> say/claim animals won't be animals is ludicrous.
>>>>>
>>>> Disagree, but at least you are honest about the conservative special
>>>> entitlement world view. I give you credit for that.
>>>
>>> Special entitlement is a fact and is nothing to
>>> be ashamed of, denied or swept under the rug
>>> as is the typical liberal wont.
>>
>> You back special entitlements.
>>
>> I back equal rights.
> 
> Of course you would. You're a liberal and *equal rights*
> include things that are not rights at all.

Such as? Having productivity be better tied to financial gain?

> FYI, the Constitution
> delineates certain God-Given human rights and having a job
> or money is not listed among them.

The word "god" does not appear in the Constitution. And wanting a 
stronger tie between productivity and financial gain is not the same 
thing as a guarantee of a job or money. You are arguing against a straw man.

> What you liberals call
> equal rights are actually equal entitlements for all.

People are entitled to be treated like humans. All. Is that what you mean?

> Take
> from the rich and give to you poor. Yah, that's the ticket.

This is not a position I support -- other than helping those in need 
such as vets and others who are disabled or otherwise cannot take care 
of themselves. Is that what you mean?

> How droll!
> 
> <snippage of repeat and Snit incoherency>
> 
>>> Forced sharing of your inadequacy and misery is
>>> the driving force behind you liberals.
>>>
>>> Read Ayn Rand's, "We the Living" and become
>>> aware of the dreadful reality of liberalism.
> 
> Read it or STFU because the more you post the
> more you display your ignorant socialism.
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Thread

csiph-web