Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #728450

Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background.

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background.
Date 2019-02-21 20:18 +1100
Message-ID <gd78mvFan0sU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16--7.04pm.Seattle.2019> <gd6t9fF8aqdU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.21--0.48am.Seattle.2019>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 21/02/2019 7:48 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Sylvia to me:
>>> 95% of our galaxy is "dark matter" ( unseen mass );
>>> it's spherical, like earth, not a disk,
>>> and it's denser in the middle, like earth.
>>>
>>> What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ?
>>> Just because we haven't seen it, doesn't mean it isn't viewable.
>>
>> [ We're limited to 3 "improbable/meaningless" options ]
> 
> Good thing your "eyesight" and IMAGINATION are flawless, right ?
> 
> Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background
> might've blinded us, so we can't see "Meta-ColdDarkMatter"
> ( mCDM; cold, decayed particles; LOW ENERGY physics ).
> 

The microwave background radiation is electromagnetic. It wouldn't 
preclude detection of other kinds of radiation. It is also pretty cold. 
If dark matter were radiating EM, it would have to be cold indeed not to 
have been spotted. If it were capable of radiating EM, it would also be 
expected to absorb it, an effect which is also conspicuous by its absence.

You're left with interactions that are so small that they cannot be 
rules out by observations performed so far.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-16 19:04 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:44 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:57 -0500
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 10:03 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-17 14:46 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:16 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-22 09:49 -0600
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:03 +1100
    Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-21 00:48 -0800
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:18 +1100
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 12:02 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 23:40 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-22 19:20 +1100
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 01:44 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Wade Alvarado <waal@ocwf4ds.ic> - 2019-02-22 14:49 +0000
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-23 09:03 +1100
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 19:45 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:33 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-22 10:39 -0800
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 10:24 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 13:30 -0500
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 23:42 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 10:51 -0800

csiph-web