Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ?

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ?
Date	2019-02-23 23:42 -0800
Organization	Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID	<5C724AE2.75FF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <gd6t9fF8aqdU1@mid.individual.net> <5C6FA754.AC@ix.netcom.com> <gd9pn3Frn4pU2@mid.individual.net> <5C7041DC.7AE7@ix.netcom.com> <5C718FF7.2ACA@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/02/2019 6:40 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On 17/02/2019 2:04 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > > >>> 95% of our galaxy is "dark matter" ( unseen mass );
> > > >>> it's spherical, like earth, not a disk,
> > > >>> and it's denser in the middle, like earth.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ?
> > > >>> Just because we haven't seen it, doesn't mean it isn't viewable.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> What do you mean by this?
> > > >>
> > > >> a) Dark matter emits light, but it all just happens to be blocked from
> > > >> our view by other matter?
> > > >>
> > > >> b) Dark matter emits light, but we've just failed to look in the right
> > > >> direction?
> > > >>
> > > >> c) Dark matter emits a kind of light beyond our understanding that we
> > > >> can't detect?
> > > >>
> > > >> d) Something else.
> > > >>
> > > >> (a) and (b) are highly improbable.
> > > >>
> > > >> (c) is pseudo-scientific meaningless drivel.
> > > >>
> > > >> (d) what else?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dark matter is matter that is soooo far away..that you cannot see the
> > > > light that it emits.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   a few trillion miles away..
> > > >
> > > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
> > > >
> > >
> > > We can see stuff that's near the edge of the universe, so far away that
> > > its light started out soon after the big bang. I don't think distance is
> > > a problem.
> > >
> > > Sylvia.
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake...I meant to write  a few trillion light years away.
> >
> 
> That means...Before the big bang...before Time...where Time doesn't
> exist. Very far away.
> 
> Very, very far away...
> 
> where Light doesn't travel.



But, I aleady explained what this 'dark matter' is...

it appears to me to look like..someone sleeping, maybe having a dream..
it looks like this thing you call 'dark matter' is actually a
huge brain...sleeping...dreaming.

I don't know if you are the dream, all I know it apears that this thing you call dark matter is
just someone having a dream.

Just so you know...in case someone ask.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Thread

What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-16 19:04 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:44 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:57 -0500
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 10:03 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-17 14:46 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:16 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-22 09:49 -0600
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:03 +1100
    Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-21 00:48 -0800
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:18 +1100
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 12:02 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 23:40 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-22 19:20 +1100
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 01:44 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Wade Alvarado <waal@ocwf4ds.ic> - 2019-02-22 14:49 +0000
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-23 09:03 +1100
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 19:45 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:33 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-22 10:39 -0800
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 10:24 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 13:30 -0500
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 23:42 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 10:51 -0800

csiph-web