Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318613
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Ping Owl: Saving a bunch of recipes to PDF |
| Date | 2015-09-02 15:09 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <famci93.jidf@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <D20BEB0D.59A87%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fasdfnv83.jiasd@rooftop.invalid> <D20C5D3C.59B23%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/2/15, 7:45 AM, in article fasdfnv83.jiasd@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> You moved goal posts and asked about saving a bunch of recipes to PDF. >> >>> Well, I played for a bit. The ONLY changes I made to my computer to do this >>> was to add Paparazzi to my dock so I could get to it easily and, as I opened >>> it the first time (not shown) it asked if I wanted to update so I did. I >>> also set Paparazzi's save folder to the Recipe folder we have been looking >>> at. >> >>> Other than that NO changes. No added scripts. No added extensions. No added >>> anything. >> >>> <http://youtu.be/c65ojXTxynU> >> >>> In under 3 minutes I was able to save all the recipes on the allrecipes.com >>> homepage to my computer as PDFs... including getting the print version so >>> they would look good. To be fair: that was my second attempt. With my first >>> I goofed on a search and replace and instead of just undoing I started from >>> scratch to "look good" on the video. >> >>> Not a hard challenge at all. :) >> >> OMG you have got to be kidding me! LOL! >> I was going to show you this improvement to teh "workflow": >> >> https://vid.me/flKe > You ended up with *three* in about 30 seconds. Say some is starting and > ending... we will say one every 5 seconds. > I did about 80 in about 2 minutes... Bullshit. > so averaging about 20 for each of those > thirty seconds you took... and that is WITHOUT creating new scripts to > cheat. I am close to 10x faster WITHOUT having to script things before hand! > Now if I wanted, I ALREADY have a "get links" action... I could modify that > to scroll to the bottom (to get the page to show more) then massage the data > and find any line with a ? in it, replacing that with "print/" and then > copying it. Would have to test to see if Paparazzi is scriptable, but even > if not could do UI scripting and likely automate that. So do it. Talk is cheap. > So with a bit of work could do it with one hot key. But that is not the > point. >> but since you went insane with that 3-minute dance (holy shit wtf?!) >> all I have to say is, "Dude, let the computer do the work for you": >> >> https://vid.me/X4kA > As I said... I could do it, too (and I am not a programmer). So do it already. > Misses the > point. But still, curious what your script looks like. Sorry. It's proprietary. >> Magic dust. Time to eat some. >> 70 seconds. >> >> God, I'm so glad I'm not stuck with a Mack. > I do not think any truck could do this well.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Ping Owl: Saving a bunch of recipes to PDF owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:45 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Saving a bunch of recipes to PDF owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:09 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Saving a bunch of recipes to PDF owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 20:05 +0000
Re: Ping Owl: Saving a bunch of recipes to PDF owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 11:27 +0000
csiph-web