Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > ger.ct > #334741

Re: But the answer is 5!

From Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Newsgroups ger.ct
Subject Re: But the answer is 5!
Date 2017-12-29 09:21 +0100
Organization IEEE Journal of Wasted Time
Message-ID <famc8gFlvabU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <f78f35e55b211edff44985a3a53b360d@dizum.com> <0Te36cibIb8qNfm%dennis@coredump.d--p.de> <p24tj4$ohk$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 29.12.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Dr. Joachim Neudert:
> Am 28.12.17 um 22:28 schrieb Dennis Preiser:
>> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DK_vCBOUEAA500a.jpg
>>
>> Schön, für jeden was dabei!
>>
>> Dennis
>>
> Ich kapier es echt nicht, kann mir jemand erklären warum das 5 sein soll?

Mehrheitsentscheidung?

Back to ger.ct | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-28 22:10 +0100
  Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-28 21:28 +0000
    Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:15 +0100
      Re: But the answer is 5! Dennis Preiser <d__p@d--p.de> - 2017-12-29 08:20 +0000
        Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:30 +0100
      Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 09:21 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 09:34 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:52 -0800
      Re: But the answer is 5! Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2017-12-29 09:31 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2017-12-29 10:45 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Gerald Gruner <gerald314@yahoo.de> - 2017-12-30 15:19 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2017-12-30 23:47 +0100
        Re: But the answer is 5! Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2017-12-29 15:20 +0000
        Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2017-12-29 16:32 +0000
          Re: But the answer is 5! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-12-29 20:22 +0100
          Re: But the answer is 5! Lothar Frings <Lothar.Frings@gmx.de> - 2018-01-02 00:53 -0800
            Re: But the answer is 5! Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2018-01-02 10:36 +0000

csiph-web