Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #118606
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem |
| Date | 2025-05-11 21:13 -0400 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <faa0eeeda0e841eacce5537fc2a994b6be9d73f9@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <g55UP.688178$4AM6.545580@fx17.ams4> <87o6vy4ulc.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vvrb1g$me5h$2@dont-email.me> <f2bc11d4d57ba6260c0cca597204057a28c8276e@i2pn2.org> <vvrg32$n9a9$2@dont-email.me> |
On 5/11/25 8:41 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/11/2025 6:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 5/11/25 7:14 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 5/11/2025 6:05 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: >>>> Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> writes: >>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2025 18:15:47 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/05/2025 17:59, Mr Flibble wrote: >>>>>>> it is impossible to obtain a halting result >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That sure looks like a concession that it's impossible to devise an >>>>>> algorithm that will produce a halting result. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well done. We got you there in the end. >>>>> >>>>> No. The reason why it is impossible to obtain a halting result for >>>>> pathological input is not the reason proposed by Turing (i.e. self- >>>>> referential diagonalization), it is impossible to obtain a halting >>>>> result >>>>> for pathological input because the self-referential conflation of >>>>> decider >>>>> and input is a category error that prevents us from performing >>>>> diagonalization. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to determine whether a given input is "pathological" >>>> or not? >>>> >>>>> To usefully advance research in this area pathological input needs >>>>> to be >>>>> excluded from the set of programs that can be analysed by a decider. >>>> >>>> Can this exclusion be performed reliably and consistently? >>>> >>> >>> That is a good question. The answer is definitely >>> yes. When HHH emulates DDD it only needs to see >>> that DDD is calling itself with no conditional branch >>> instructions inbetween. >>> >>> Whether a function computed by a Turing machine can >>> do this is a different question. >>> >> >> So, try to do it. >> > > No need to. DDD emulated by HHH according to the > rules of the computational language that DD is > encoded within already proves that the HP > "impossible" input specifies a non-halting > sequence of configurations. So, you are admitting you can't. The rules of computation language say that HHH must be a funciton of *OMLY* it explict input, and thus for HHH to actually emulate DDD, then the HHH that DDD calls must be part of the input (and part of DDD). Since none of your HHH's that give an answer actually DO a correct emulation, and that is the only kind really accept by computational language (without the EXPLICT partial modifier), your statement is just a NULL statement that doesn't say anything. Since the CORRECT emulation of DDD by the rules you require (minus the invalid restriction that it be by a machine that can't do it) shows that DDD WILL halt for any of your HHH that return an answer, so every HHH(DDD) that returns 0 is just wrong. > > This by itself is much more progress than anyone > else has ever made on the halting problem. > Nope, as it is just lies. > To the best of my recollection > Mike has already agreed that the outermost HHH > can dig into the details of all of the levels > of recursive simulation to get the details that > it currently uses. All of these details are > merely data to this outermost HHH. > > This is analogous to a master UTM examining > all of its own tape, even those portions that > are allocated to slave UTMs. > Which doesn't help, since you don't actually have any UTMs. Remember, BY DEFINITON, a UTM just reproduces the behavior of the machine described by its input. Not report what it does, but to DO it. So, BY DEFINITION, a UTM given a non-halting input, can not halt. And thus, a UTM can't be used as a decider if the input can be a non-halting program, and thus worthless as a Halt Decider. Remember, one way of stateing the requirements of a Halt Decider is that H(D) returns "Halting" if UTM(D) will halt, and "Non-Halting" if UTM(D) will not halt. THis does not mean change D to use UTM, it mean the exact D that was given to H is given to UTM, and NONE of the code used by it changes. The fact that you model can't seem to handle that just shows your model is incorrect. And yes, the outer Decider can try to understand the contents and meaning of the tape of the machine it is emulating, but first you have to show how it recognizes that machine, when you don't put non-Turing Complete limitations on your programs like you do. This means that DDD can have its own copy of HHH and thus HHH can't use its address as the test, and DDD needs to be able to make a copy of its input at another portion of the tape (new memory addresses in your system). Try to allow that and see what you get. The fact that your system fails to be Turing Complete just proves that it can't be the equivalent of the systems in the proof.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 13:21 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 15:44 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 14:48 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 16:25 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 15:34 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 16:47 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 15:49 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 10:56 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:01 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-11 16:04 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 11:51 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 16:05 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 11:49 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:54 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:14 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:24 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 13:34 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:44 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 13:49 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 14:10 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 13:18 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 14:21 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 19:27 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 16:59 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:06 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 17:15 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 12:19 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:26 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 17:33 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:48 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:15 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:31 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 16:05 -0700
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 18:14 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 19:45 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 19:41 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 20:43 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 21:13 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 20:48 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 07:40 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-12 09:29 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 19:16 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 17:13 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 15:58 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 15:55 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 21:42 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 16:45 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 19:22 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 19:19 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 02:07 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 20:12 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 02:34 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:05 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 03:23 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:30 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 22:34 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:39 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 22:42 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:53 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 22:54 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:57 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 22:59 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:39 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:38 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-13 10:58 +0300
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 07:47 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 10:46 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:48 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:03 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 12:05 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:44 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:43 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 07:43 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 21:37 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:09 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 03:37 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 20:11 -0700
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 22:32 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 05:13 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:48 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 05:12 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 21:37 -0700
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 05:58 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-05-13 22:22 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-05-13 22:45 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 07:51 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 10:48 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:54 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:51 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 11:29 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 18:03 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-05-12 17:32 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:52 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:56 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-12 18:58 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-05-13 01:08 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 06:57 +0800
Truthmaker Maximalism and pathological self-reference olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 18:15 -0500
Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and pathological self-reference wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 07:28 +0800
Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and pathological self-reference olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 15:54 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-12 11:59 +0300
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-11 10:49 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 17:11 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 15:48 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 10:22 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:59 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-13 11:18 +0300
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-11 14:59 +0000
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-11 16:25 +0100
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 16:00 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-11 15:42 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-12 11:53 +0300
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:21 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:09 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 12:15 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 11:43 -0500
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 12:49 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 22:04 -0400
Re: Flibble’s Leap: Why Behavioral Divergence Implies a Type Distinction in the Halting Problem Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-13 11:27 +0300
csiph-web